Whale tale!

How did whales enter into the international columns of newspapers in the first place?


Khalid Saleem February 03, 2020
The writer is former Ambassador of Pakistan and ex- Assistant Secretary-General of OIC

An item of news, courtesy AFP, datelined Perth, caught one’s attention the other day. It related to some ‘135 short-finned pilot whales’ having died after ‘a mass beaching as rescuers worked to herd those still alive back out to sea’.

Whales have been in the news off and on. Not undeservedly, one might add. After all, as the largest living creatures on this earth, they do deserve attention a bit out of the ordinary. Whales have been the victims of whalers for as long as one can remember. Despite International Conventions to regulate and curtail the practice of whaling, this elegant creature continues to be the victim of mass culling in several parts of the world — in some illegally, in others according to the law.

The whole thing makes little sense. What drives large groups of these elegant creatures to commit such acts of mass suicide? Is it part of nature’s plan to keep the population of whales within reasonable limits or are they driven to this extreme act by some actions of Man? Be that as it may, this event is the cause of some anguish and deserves to be looked into in some depth. In this age of globalisation, when the small fry are being subjected to a squeeze of gigantic proportions, it is somewhat refreshing to read about these larger than life creatures.

How did whales enter into the international columns of newspapers in the first place? Fishing rights — and fishing wrongs, if you wish — have for some time been a matter of concern to international economists. Talking of International Economic Affairs, it needs to be put on record that fishing in troubled waters has been the favourite sport of wealthy nations for as long as one can remember. Other nations, though poor but having a craving nevertheless to be part of the big league, have also been dabbling in the same game. All in all, this cannot be pushed aside as a mere fishy story since the whale, though very much a creature of the sea, is not a fish at all. Fish are cold-blooded but not mammals, which the whales, for better or for worse, happen to be!

Humankind — all pretensions notwithstanding — has never had a particularly happy reputation, either as a rational or, indeed, a benign species. The creatures of the sea, much like the creatures on land, have been hunted down without discrimination through the ages. Why this special feeling, then, for the whales, the reader may well ask? Is it because they happen to be fellow mammals living in a hostile environment? Or maybe, the fact has registered that, despite their gigantic size, whales do have the general reputation of being rather gentle creatures.

Be that as it may, whale-wise, humankind can be neatly divided into two camps — one for whaling; the other opposed to it. The first one is composed of those who have looked upon whales for ages as a handy source of food. The second camp includes the so-called animal lovers, whose principal concern is to show some kindness to a fellow mammal species. The whole matter, therefore, has the makings of an international tangle. And what does the world community generally do in similar circumstances? It sets up an International Commission, of course; what else?

This is how the body known as the International Whaling Commission came into existence. In 1986, a moratorium of sorts on “commercial whale hunts” was agreed upon. If the afore-stated conveys the impression that this Commission has put a stop to the killing of whales, perish the thought. The International Whaling Commission grants quotas to various communities around the world for their whale hunting expeditions. It merely attempts to limit the number of whales they are allowed to slaughter in a given season.

Coming back to where one started, there remains something of a mystery about these mass suicides of the whale species. Why should they be intent on doing what a good part of the world community is hoping to prevent? Could it possibly be part of nature’s plan to keep the much-vaunted multilateral diplomatist community in business? What a horrendous thought, that!

 

Published in The Express Tribune, February 3rd, 2020.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ