Report doesn’t reflect uptick in graft: Transparency International Pakistan

Chairman says score falling by one is ‘within standard margin of error’

​ Our Correspondent January 26, 2020
Transparency International Pakistan. STOCK IMAGE

ISLAMABAD: The head of the Transparency International’s Pakistan chapter on Sunday maintained that the country slipping three spots in the global graft perception index for 2019 did not reflect an increase of decrease in corruption as its score falling from 33 to 32 was “within the standard margin of error”.

“The lowering of Pakistan’s score by one does not reflect any increase or decrease in corruption as it is within the standard margin of error which is 2.46%,” a statement quoted TI Pakistan Chairman Advocate Sohail Muzzafar as saying.

He pointed out that the score had been lowered from 88 to 87 for Denmark, which was the least corrupt country in both 2018 and 2019.

“A number of politicians, TV channels and newspapers have misreported the CPI [Corruption Perceptions Index] report, and given false figures [sic] trying to damage the reputation of Pakistan,” he added.

Muzzafar said the statement had been issued to set the record straight.

He claimed that the 2020 data from the Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index (BSTI) – one of the eight sources used in the Pakistan CPI – had not been made public so far. Certain segments of the media, he added, were quoting data from 2018 index.

“The Rule of Law data was collected between May and November 2018, and the RLI [Rule of Law Index] 2018 used data collected between May and December 2017. In fact, the BTI score is lower by 4.12 and not 3, and RLI score is lower by 2.4 and not 2,” the statement read.

“And the scores of other 6 sources used in CPI are all different from 2018. Scores of 3 sources (WB, PRS, EIU) are [sic] increased and in [the remaining] sources (VDP, WEF, GICR) the scores are reduced.”

Responding to the government’s criticism, Muzzafar said the CPI 2019 had not declared the government of former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf as the most corrupt and the incumbent PTI government as the second most corrupt.

He added that it had also not termed the governments of PML-N and PPP as “cleanest” and “second cleanest” respectively.

“[The] CPI do [sic] not include any data of any survey conducted by Transparency International,” he clarified.

“[The] CPI is compiled by Transparency International at Berlin and TI-Pakistan has no role in [the] preparation of the CPI.”

The TI Pakistan chairman also pointed out that he praised the anti-corruption efforts of present government and the better performance of NAB in an earlier press statement.

On Friday, a day after the report was released, the federal government on Friday dismissed TI’s annual global graft perception index as “biased” and “unfair”.

Speaking at a news conference, Special Assistant to the PM on Information Dr Firdous Ashiq Awan raised questions over the “transparency” of the TI itself.

She alleged that the Pakistan chapter of the TI was granted favours by the previous PML-N government.

However, she has now welcomed the TI Pakistan chief’s clarification.

The opposition had declared the TI report had exposed the PTI government.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ