Asif Mahmood Rehan filed a petition, through Advocate Haroonur Rasheed, on behalf of minorities, wherein he listed the establishment secretary, Islamabad Police IG and AIG as respondents in the case.
Rehan maintained that the government had reserved 18 seats for members of minority communities for recruitment in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) police. However, only Muslim candidates were recruited.
The petitioner stated that a five per cent minority quota for the hiring of ASIs and constables was advertised in national newspapers.
Candidates from the minority communities qualified in the written test and interview but were not employed under the quota he contended, recalling that as per the Supreme Court’s ruling, no one else could be recruited on the minority quota.
The petition said the matter was brought before the Islamabad IG but he has yet to take any action on the complaint.
Tax collection row
The hearing of a case on tax collection dispute between the Islamabad Metropolitan Corporation (IMC) and the Capital Development Authority (CDA) was adjourned because Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani is on leave.
At the last hearing of the case, the IHC had sought arguments from the parties. The IMC had filed a petition against the CDA on the collection of property tax which stated that Rs4 billion collected by CDA as property tax over three years should be handed over to the IMC and that the court should prevent the CDA from collecting property tax.
IIUI clash
Additional District and Sessions Judge Mohammad Ali Warraich sought arguments from the petitioner over a bail plea filed by the eight suspects, including Amirullah, Hadiullah, Ali Naqi Ammar, Mustafiz, Sarfraz, Abdul Samad, Noor, Mohammad Asghar and others, who had been arrested in the International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI) clash case.
A student had been killed while dozens were injured in the clash between activists of Saraiki Students Council and the Islami Jamiat Tulba.
During Friday’s hearing, the suspects’ lawyers had sought to argue in favour of bail. However, owing to the paucity of time, the plaintiff's lawyer could not complete his arguments. The court has directed the plaintiff's lawyer to continue his arguments at the next hearing and adjourned it hearing until Saturday, January 25.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ