Murderous decisions
It seems that, for the political parties, mass murder was the key to attaining true clarity.

It’s not a traditional approach to meditation, I will grant them that much. And I am forced to wonder whether it was the first method they tried or was there a lot of fruitless searching for empty roads to drive on and lighting of scented candles before finally realising that mass murder was the key to attaining true clarity. Also, what is it exactly about the killing of scores of people in a short time span that gives them the required focus? Is it the concentration needed to organise a cull on such a large scale? Maybe the rat-a-tat-tat of machine gun fire and the following thud of a body hitting the floor creates a sort of hypnotic trance. Regardless, the 100 people who were killed last week in the violence that resulted in a return to the status quo have died knowing that at least their lives were sacrificed for a worthy cause. Without their senseless murders, the parties could never have split so dramatically with angry pronouncements and then reconciled their differences in such a short time. Many have said that their eventual reunion was a foregone conclusion. That the PPP and MQM are like that married couple who fight every six months and the breaking of furniture, tossing of crockery and killing of bystanders is just a part of the process they need to work through to stay together (okay maybe I’m the only one who says that). Nevertheless, we may all know the way the story ends, but that doesn’t mean the participants don’t require the predetermined performances to reach their goal. So if it took 100 murders at the hands of political parties and roving gangs of disgruntled wives and girlfriends that Rehman Malik is trying to warn us about, for that final major decision to get back to exactly where we were two weeks ago to be made, then so be it.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 21st, 2011.













COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ