Iranian state media, however, is claiming that 80 “American terrorists” had been killed and that the bases had been severely damaged in a “crushing response” to Soleimani’s death. But why would Iran avoid casualties and then, for domestic consumption at least, claim it inflicted massive casualties? One explanation is that this was the only way to send a message to the US while avoiding getting into an all-out war and also pacifying domestic demand for revenge. It appears the Iranians have successfully killed three birds with one stone, because hours after the strikes, US President Donald Trump began suggesting that the US would not respond with further violence.
Much like American justification for the attack on Soleimani, the Iranian claim that the reprisal attack was an act of self-defence is dubious, at best. Still, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif’s tweet that attacks on the US had “concluded” was enough to get Trump — who had threatened to commit war crimes just a few days ago — to walk back. Trump’s televised statement, however, was another example of fudging the facts. He claimed Iran would never be allowed to have nuclear weapons while he is president while ignoring that Iran only restarted its quest for the bomb because he had violated the Iran nuclear deal. But at least for now, it appears the hawks in the Trump administration have failed. And that is authentic good news.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 10th, 2020.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ