The celebrity posted picture of one of the most feared historic figures, Adolf Hitler alongside the current Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi. Both the personalities seem to be wearing similar outfits, which may just be a coincidence, but Cusack clearly refrained from commenting on his own comparison.
https://twitter.com/johncusack/status/1213601875297214465
Hitler was a German politician and leader of the Nazi Party. He rose to power as the chancellor of Germany in 1933, and as Führer in 1934. During his dictatorship from 1933 to 1945, he initiated World War II in Europe by invading Poland on September 1, 1939.
Where as Modi has rose through similar tangents of fame, ever since he revoked article 370 and denied the Indian Occupied Kashmir of its special status. Following this the Indian PM also passed a citizenship amendment bill which prevents muslims from attaining Indian nationality - while also creating an alarming situation for muslims who are already Indian nationals.
Simply the fact that his bill has made religion a basis for attaining nationality provoked protests in India, making even his followers, think twice.
Nevertheless, here's what Twitterati had to say about the Cusack's comparison:
What gave it away? The shorts or the pact with the devil?
— Jennifer (@jennystitzel) January 4, 2020
Let's talk about India's first PM #Nehru ji pic.twitter.com/UQqhG8bE7M
— Arpita Shaiva (@arpispeaks) January 5, 2020
https://twitter.com/YippeekiYay_DH/status/1213678356304220160
— Indian (@Indian02218285) January 4, 2020
Thank you @johncusack for bringing this to your followers. Let the world get enlightened and informed on what is happening in India today. It is #Nazi2ndpart
— Vimal (@VC_lifeDrives) January 5, 2020
In an recent speech modi said "people can be identified by their clothes." Yup for once I agree.
— Piyush (@itsme_literally) January 5, 2020
Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ