That said, the verdict, which provides a detailed look into the investigation, does highlight the huge gaps in capability that plague our law enforcement agencies. The conviction, the ruling admits, rests on circumstantial evidence. Meanwhile, none of the allegations against the other suspects could be backed up with any credible proof.
The entire investigation, it appears, rests primarily on verbal accounts, which does seem somewhat baffling considering the violent nature of the case. Surely a murder investigation ought to have yielded more tangible evidence. The recounting of case proceedings also highlights how stuck in the past our investigative processes and laws concerning admissible evidence are. For instance, there is a debate on the admissibility of DNA evidence while polygraph or lie-detector tests — which are known the world over to be highly inaccurate — are treated with what seems a bit more credence.
Finally, stepping away from the judicial and investigative aspects, the life and death of Qandeel also raise questions of gender and class attitudes that we, as a nation, need to introspect on. It is true that her murder is a direct result of our society’s obsession with dictating what is and isn’t ‘proper’ for women and girls. But it is the imperviousness of our country’s class system that left someone born in crippling poverty like her with no shot at prosperity. As we lionise her in death, we should also reflect on the ridicule and derision we poured on her in life as she pursued a future that was tragically out of reach.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 1st, 2019.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ