Twitter lauds Qandeel's murder case verdict but questions Qavi's acquittal

Prime suspect Mufti Abdul Qavi's acquittal aroused controversy and outrage as well


Entertainment Desk September 27, 2019

Qandeel Baloch – born Fouzia Azeem – was strangled to death in her house in Multan’s Karimabad area. The killing took place on July 16, 2016 and just days after, her very own brothers assumed full responsibility of it, citing Qandeel's notoriety and social pressure as the main reasons.

Qandeel had, ironically, made a risque Facebook video once with which she hoped to change “the typical orthodox mindset” of the people in Pakistan, wherein nearly 500 women are killed every year in the name of “honour.”

Needless to say, Qandeel's murder sent shock waves across Pakistan and triggered an outpouring of grief on social media, even from those who had previously been critising the aspiring model  for her overt sexuality. Yet, her parents pardoned their sons this August, following which the court stated that pardoning an accused is not legally permissible in the case of honour killings.

But in the latest developement, one of the brothers - Muhammad Waseem - has been found guilty of the murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. In Friday's 38-page verdict, Judge Imran Shafi acquitted five other people, including another one of Qandeel’s brothers, Aslam Shaheen, and Mufti Abdul Qavi, the cleric the late starlet had made another risque video with. The court has now declared Qandeel’s third brother Arif a proclaimed offender as well.

The recent turn of events has ignited a serious debate on social media, with many questing whether justice has really been served or not.

https://twitter.com/S_J_H_R_C/status/1177483877671063558

One user called the acquittal of prime suspect Mufti a "serious flaw in the judicial inquiry process," suggesting the matter must be resolved in all proportions, given that the facilitators of honour killings and murders roam freely.

https://twitter.com/Bon_Viveur2/status/1177476183631335431

Another sarcastically called the verdict 'good news.' He said,
"Why did they let Mufti Qavi go? Too powerful to convict him?"

https://twitter.com/IrshadA63220151/status/117751027519014502

One Twitter user went as far as to say that the cleric should have been sentenced to death to prevent society from going astray.

https://twitter.com/param9977/status/1177508586844327936

One wrote that maybe Waseem's life sentence can finally bring honour to his family.



One user added the incident provoked 'a strange, bittersweet feeling' in her. "There was a court of public opinion for #Qandeel too, held everywhere from her village to the most metropolitan cities in the country. And we were very quick to convict her there and then absolve ourselves of any complicity in her undoing. However, it took 3 yrs to get a judgement for her brother," she wrote. "I wonder how long it will take us to realise that we shouldn’t let ourselves off the hook; that our social structure is rotten and works against people like #Qandeel who wish to make something of themselves on their own terms."



Meanwhile, another user chose to see the light at the end of the tunnel.



Others claimed that 'half of justice is more dangerous than injustice,' just as half the truth is more dangerous than a lie, implying that the case will now forever remain closed and the remaining suspects will forever roam freely.

https://twitter.com/UzmaC73/status/1177470518477254657

While this user dissolved the argument altogether with his remark.

Have something to add to the story? Share in the comments below.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ