Obama aide confirms US holding back aid to Pakistan

Obama's chief of staff William Daley confirms the US is holding back some military aid.


Afp/reuters July 10, 2011

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama's chief of staff, William Daley confirmed Sunday the United States (US) is holding back some military aid to Pakistan, after a New York Times report had earlier reported $800 million was being withheld.

"They've taken some steps that have given us reason to pause on some of the aid which we're giving to the military, and we're trying to work through that," William Daley told ABC's "This Week With Christiane Amanpour."

As a result, "We'll hold back some of the money that the American taxpayers have committed to give," he said, adding this amounted to about $800 million, or more than a third of the $2 billion given to Pakistan for security assistance.

Earlier on Saturday, the New York Times had reported on Saturday that the Obama administration would hold back about $800 million in aid to the Pakistani military because Washington was unhappy with Pakistan's expulsion of US military trainers and its campaign against militants.

Relations between the two governments have been strained with the United States wanting Pakistan to intensify its counterterrorism efforts. The relationship also has been tense due to the surprise US raid that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden on May 2, US drone attacks that have killed civilians and a raft of other issues.

The Times, citing three US senior officials, said the United States was suspending or canceling $800 million in aid and equipment – more than a third of the $2 billion it gives Pakistan for security assistance.

About $300 million in US funding is to reimburse Pakistan for deploying more than 100,000 troops along the Afghan border to combat Taliban and other militant forces. Other funding covers training and military hardware, Times sources said.

US officials told the newspaper the aid and equipment could be resumed if relations improve and Pakistan takes more action against militants.

Pakistan has shut down a US program that had been training paramilitary forces, sending home more than 100 US trainers in recent weeks, and has threatened to close the base the CIA has been using for drone plane attacks on militant targets.

The Times said in private briefings with congressional staffers last month that Pentagon officials said they would be taking a stronger stance toward Pakistan.

"They wanted to tell us, 'Guys, we're delivering the message that this is not business as usual and we've got this under control,'" one senior Senate aide told the newspaper.

In May, a US Navy SEAL team raided a compound where Bin Laden was living in a Abbottabad, near Pakistan's military academy, raising questions about whether Pakistani officials had helped hide him. Pakistan complained it had not been told in advance about the raid.

Last week Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, accused Pakistan of kidnapping and killing a journalist.

The US-Pakistan relationship also was damaged last year after a CIA contractor in Lahore killed two Pakistanis he said were trying to rob him.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (80)

Sajjad Ashraf | 9 years ago | Reply

One Mr. Incrdible is worried at US declaring Pakistan as a terrorist state. He better take lesson in history. US is the biggest perpetrator of state terrorism in the world. Nations need to show spine to live honorably. Believe me US cannot harm 180 million people if they know how to stand up for their rights.

harkol | 9 years ago | Reply

@Hassan:

I don't think things will go as bleak as you make it out to be, as there are enough sane elements in Pakistan. If only they can subdue Taliban like grip Pak Army has on the policies and economy, then Pakistan can bounce back so fast the whole world will be surprised.

The question really is - will the silent majority finally wake up against Army & Militant groups?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ