
The release of Abhinandan could have been the start of changed attitudes, regardless of what oaccurred at both ends before that point. However, the Indian response has been less than grateful. The Indian media has hinted that Pakistan released the pilot because it was weak or otherwise required to release him as per the Geneva Conventions on prisoners of war. The counterargument is Pakistan and India had not declared active war, so Abhinandan was not a POW. As for offerings of tea by way of humane treatment of the pilot, it is confusing for many on both sides that while the two nuclear countries threaten war and claim offences in the name of defence pointing to the other as the instigator, much of the focus was on the treatment of one captured man from the other side.
Nevertheless, while humane dealing was meted out to Abhinandan, the treatment of affected civilians remains the opposite. There needs to be a conscious effort by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian army to come clean and steer the region out of conflict. Admittedly, dialogue in the past has been unfruitful. However, a different approach is required with mediators as buffers to facilitate both sides in stating what they want and recognising that both countries mutually have a desire for their own safety and doing away with terrorists.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 3rd, 2019.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ