Budgeting for 2010-11


Editorial June 05, 2010

There is much that we disagree with what Finance Minister Dr Abdul Hafeez Sheikh said during his budget speech on the floor of the National Assembly on June 5. Defending the substantial rise in defence expenditures, from Rs378 billion last year to Rs442 billion for 2010-11 (an increase of almost 17 per cent), the minister said that security was the government’s “topmost” issue. While that indeed may be the case to an extent, given Pakistan’s participation in the war on terror and the massive impact its fallout has had on the people of Pakistan and the economy, the fact is that there is more to this debate. For instance, over the past five years or so, governments have spent a mere 0.5-0.6 per cent on health and just two per cent on education. In any case, given that debt servicing for 2010-11 — like last year — will be almost double the defence budget allocation, one can well understand the heavy burden of debt that hangs over all of us like a millstone.

For a country which ranks so badly on the UNDP’s Human Development Index, this kind of neglect and failure to increase allocations on both education and health borders on the criminal. Besides, while security may be the government’s “topmost” priority, what good is security if the people are impoverished, don’t have enough to eat, are diseased and illiterate? Surely, a more educated and healthier population translates into a more productive workforce and that in turn means more potential for growth. One can only hope that the increase will be directed towards strengthening the military’s counter-insurgency capability because that is crucial to winning the war against militancy.

Moving on, instead of cutting down on the cost of running itself, the government has further increased it, by pledging an increase of 35-50 per cent in the basic pay of all federal government employees. Some measures are more salutary and need to be applauded, in particular the proposal to levy a tax of one rupee per cigarette. This is likely to be fought tooth and nail by the tobacco lobby but the government would do well to resist it and implement it. As for the much-heralded and debated Value Added Tax, its implementation has been delayed till Oct 1 of this year, though the minister did say — and commendably so — that collecting tax on services was the right of the provinces as agreed upon under the Seventh National Finance Commission award and that the centre intended to respect that. A tax of 10 per cent has been proposed on air-conditioners and refrigerators, the rationale being that they use a lot of electricity.

The minister claimed that the budget deficit would be brought down to four percent of GDP in 2010-11. However, given that the State Bank had said that for the outgoing fiscal year it would be around 5.6 per cent of GDP, the intended reductions for 2010-11 seems more like wishful thinking. In this regard, a pay cut of 10 per cent for ministers may seem well-intentioned but is hardly going to have any impact on reducing non-development expenditure. However, one good proposal is that the government intends to cut subsidies to PIA and Pakistan Steel, both organisations that have for years been relying on handouts from the government. Hopefully, this may force them to bring about some much-needed financial discipline. The minister said that the government wanted subsidies that targeted the poor and so the allocation for the Benazir Income Support Programme would be increased. However, we urge the government to make the disbursement process transparent since if misused its very purpose will be defeated. The main tool of the government for improving the quality of life and standard of living for the population in general is social sector spending as contained in its public sector development programme. For 2010-11, this will rise only marginally, from Rs646b billion during 2009-10 to Rs663 billion for the next fiscal year. This means that it is likely that there will not be many new schemes in this regard. Clearly, that will not be good news for the majority of Pakistanis.

Published in the Express Tribune, June 6th, 2010.

COMMENTS (5)

muhammed ashraf gandhi | 13 years ago | Reply budget reflects gvt intention to safe gaurd the rich at trhe cost of poor.the govt. has come out with a plan to tax the sectors which r not contributing the gdp also the taxable income of the waderas zamidars and malaks has not been brought into the net. nor the rise in theminimum wage of the unskilled worker has been increased as rs. 7000 had been announced earlier. if the govt. servants salary has been increased why not for the poors in the private sectors. the govt. should moniter that the employers atleast pay rs.7000 to the unskilled workers. the industries r still not paying even rs. 6000 to its employees. this should be checked rather than giving an opportunity to the workers to come on the roads. although the speech of the f.m. was loaded with boutiques it had nothing for the common man.no solution has declared for white elephants nor nothing has been said of the circula debt.
Syed A. Mateen | 13 years ago | Reply I am shocked and disappointed and could not even think and imagine that the government will present such a budget which will provide no relief to the middle class and poor people of Pakistan. Pakistan is lacking in hiring competitive economic managers. Either Pakistan import economic managers from abroad or hire some one who was sitting ideal and has nothing to do. It is pathetic that while PPP government took over from General Pervez Musharraf, government wanted to induct Ishaq Dar as Federal Finance Minister, but as PML(N) could not come in line with the PPP government, the sitting government did not have any option to induct Naveed Qamar. He also could not run the show therefore government hired the services of Mr. Shaukat Tareen. He also proved to be a complete failure and resigned to take over the Silk Bank. Now government hired the services of Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh who previous served as Minister for Finance, Planning and Development in Government of Sindh. Then Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh got promoted during the rule of General (R) Pervez Musharraf and became Federal Minister for Privatization & Investment. During Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh’s tenure, KESC and PTCL were privatized. Neither KESC could end the load shedding in Karachi, nor PTCL proved to be worthy as till date if some one ask inquiry 1217, the subscriber has to call number of times to get the correct telephone number either of a person or a company. Pakistan has it own problems which even Mr. Shaukat Aziz who served as Federal Minister for Finance during General (R) Pervez regime and then as Prime Minister of Pakistan could not understand how to make the country economically viable. The imported Finance Ministers of Pakistan are good in taking loans from the World Bank and IMF for the government but on the other hand when ever they leave or complete the tenure, they leave the country in financial mess. Is it evident that population of the country is growing with the passage of time but our economic managers are not capable to make the country economically viable? Due to low literacy rate in the country, people time and again elect high profile, politically influential, heavy weight foreign degree holders who instead of making the country economically viable, take loans from the World Bank and the IMF by saying that they are taking loan in interest of the country in order to save the country from economic default. No Economic Manager of Pakistan has ever made answerable to the people to explain that what he has done with the money taken by the World Bank or IMF. If a patient die due to illness, people say that it was the will of Al-Mighty Allah, but if the same patient survive and return home happily, people say that the Doctor who treated the patient was very good. But in case of Pakistan’s economy, we do not require Doctor-Minister’s to treat the ailing economy. Even a simple B.Com understands that what actual problem with the economy of the county is. Now after delivering the 2010-2011 Federal Budget which has been totally refused by the people of Pakistan, I am sure that by now Dr. Abdul Hafeez Shaikh must be having namak-paras and samosas to enjoy the rainy season.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ