A resident editor of an English newspaper filed an application with the anti-harassment cell against her male colleague.
In her plea, the complainant claimed that her subordinate used the foul language against her when she inquired about the task she had assigned to him.
“He used words “bastard” and “Ullo ki Pathi” in front of entire office staff,” the plaintiff said in the application.
Nehal Hashmi in trouble again for using abusive language against judges
The complainant linked the incident to sexual harassment.
However, the respondent in the case refuted all the allegations and challenged the jurisdiction of federal ombudsman.
The defender argued that the allegations do not come under the definition of harassment.
Ombudsperson Kashmala said in her written verdict that as per the available record the said words comes under the ambit of harassment and rejected the respondent's application.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ