Karzai visit
It is hard to get past the fact that the Af-Pak relationship faces hurdles that are unlikely to be cleared.
The 23-point Islamabad Declaration signed by Presidents Asif Ali Zardari and Hamid Karzai may hint at better relations between the two traditionally hostile states. And, in fact, there are a few signs of improvement, particularly on the economic front, as the two countries pledged to increase trade and cooperation in the minerals and mines sectors. But for the most the declaration provides a temporary sheen to a relationship that at best seems to be chequered. Vague statements were made to clamp down on the cross-border travels of militants and come to the negotiating table with the Taliban in Afghanistan but any agreement reached on these matters is likely to be best lukewarm.
It is hard to get past the fact that the Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship faces hurdles that are unlikely to be cleared. Take for instance negotiating with the Taliban. For Mr Karzai, talks are a must. The writ of his government barely stretches outside Kabul and the US troops that have been propping him up will soon begin withdrawing. At this point, all the Afghan Taliban has to do is bide their time and make a takeover attempt as soon as the Americans are gone. If he wants to continue ruling Afghanistan he has to make a deal with the Taliban. For Pakistan the situation is a little different. Militants control swathes of the tribal areas and are able to strike in the cities at any point but are in no position to overthrow the government. For Mr Zardari, fighting militants is the way to go.
The issue of India, too, will always hamper relations between the two countries. Afghanistan has always been wary of Pakistan’s meddling – and rightly so. Our attitude towards Afghanistan has been determined solely by our fear of India and ruled by fanciful concepts such as ‘strategic depth’. We deny the presence of the Quetta Shura but admit the presence of the Haqqani network. Perhaps the recent military statement that Pakistani soil shouldn’t be used by foreigners for terrorist actions may bring about a change on this issue, but even if it does not, we should understand that our policies push Afghanistan into India’s lap. Seen in a void, the Islamabad Declaration will lead to greater co-operation and seemingly improved relations but these problems will always be lurking in the background.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2011.
It is hard to get past the fact that the Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship faces hurdles that are unlikely to be cleared. Take for instance negotiating with the Taliban. For Mr Karzai, talks are a must. The writ of his government barely stretches outside Kabul and the US troops that have been propping him up will soon begin withdrawing. At this point, all the Afghan Taliban has to do is bide their time and make a takeover attempt as soon as the Americans are gone. If he wants to continue ruling Afghanistan he has to make a deal with the Taliban. For Pakistan the situation is a little different. Militants control swathes of the tribal areas and are able to strike in the cities at any point but are in no position to overthrow the government. For Mr Zardari, fighting militants is the way to go.
The issue of India, too, will always hamper relations between the two countries. Afghanistan has always been wary of Pakistan’s meddling – and rightly so. Our attitude towards Afghanistan has been determined solely by our fear of India and ruled by fanciful concepts such as ‘strategic depth’. We deny the presence of the Quetta Shura but admit the presence of the Haqqani network. Perhaps the recent military statement that Pakistani soil shouldn’t be used by foreigners for terrorist actions may bring about a change on this issue, but even if it does not, we should understand that our policies push Afghanistan into India’s lap. Seen in a void, the Islamabad Declaration will lead to greater co-operation and seemingly improved relations but these problems will always be lurking in the background.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2011.