Google CEO explains why searching for 'idiot' results in images of Trump

During mid-2000s, Bush’s photo popped up whenever someone searched for 'miserable failure'


News Desk December 13, 2018
PHOTO:FILE

Google CEO Sundar Pichai explained why photos of United States President Donald Trump surface on the search engine when a user searches for the word 'idiot', reported US magazine Fortune.

Speaking in front of the House Judiciary Committee, he elaborated that the company doesn't manually intervene in search results and that "search results are based on crawling the content of web pages".

“We provide search today for any time you type in a keyword. We, as Google, have gone out and crawled and stored copies of billions of their pages in our index, and we take the keyword and match it against the pages and rank them based on over 200 signals,” Pichai maintained.

When Trump thought Christian Bale was actually Bruce Wayne

“Things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it. And based on that, you know, at any given time, we try to find the best results for that query,” he added.

The House committee's session was held to discuss whether the search engine's results were politically slanted.

It has also been revealed that the 'idiot' search result page was due to third parties' "Google bombing" the president.

Trump says standing by Saudi crown prince despite pleas from Senate

A similar incident was reported during the presidency of George W Bush. In the mid-2000s, Bush’s photo popped up whenever someone searched for “miserable failure,” The Verge said.

This article originally appeared on Fortune

COMMENTS (2)

Tapan Chatterjee | 5 years ago | Reply It may appear like s joke but its mal-funcyioning of the Google facility. Oxford Dictionary does not do this, does it? Therefore Google must urgently rectify the process.
Bunny Rabbit | 5 years ago | Reply DT's smirk in that pic explains it all .
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ