The chairman of Ruet-e-Hilal Committee Pakistan, while addressing a news conference in Islamabad on Sunday, further said that the authorities should show leniency towards Tehreek-e-Labbaik (TLP) leaders and activists for the losses incurred to public property during their protests and sit-ins just like they did to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) sit-in in 2014.
The statement comes a day after Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry announced that TLP leaders Khadim Hussain Rizvi and Pir Afzal Qadri among others have been charged with treason and terrorism. Rizvi was taken into “protective custody” as security forces launched a crackdown against the religio-political party on November 23.
TLP leader Khadim Rizvi charged with treason, terrorism: Fawad
Mufti Muneeb said the ruling party had also been involved in unlawful activities including attacking the Parliament building and PTV headquarters, adding that if they can be pardoned for conducting these acts then the TLP leaders and activists also deserved similar treatment, Express News reported.
“Cases were also lodged against current rulers, which were later dismissed on personal guarantees … treason charges are also framed on those living lavishly in palaces in Dubai these days,” said the renowned cleric, adding that a legislation should be made for uniform action on damages during protests and sit-ins.
Mufti Muneeb urged the prime minister, the chief justice and the army chief to pardon the TLP leaders for issuing provocative statements against them.
PML-N criticises govt’s move to book TLP leaders on sedition, terrorism charges
He said the authorities must refrain from making the TLP an example as this will only give them a temporary success but will ignite a fire that can engulf the entire country.
“Even superpowers have failed to control terrorism by using force … we don’t want to arouse religious sentiments and want a peaceful way to resolve the issue,” he remarked.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ