As far as water allocation goes, getting to the actual crux of the issue, the 1991 Water Accord needs to be revised. Punjab still receives the majority share of water resources when Sindh has the larger population. Forming another committee is unnecessary as the National Water Council is already in charge of the job of sourcing and allocating the country’s water supply. Allegations need to be handled by courts, lawyers, and judges, not in the National Assembly where only matters of the state should be discussed without the blame game, which does not result in any relevant conclusions. Counter-allegations also make a mockery of members of the National Assembly. By default, this demonstrates poor faith in the legal system of one’s own country.
Disharmony will breed distrust. The turmoil and internal tussles will reduce investor interest and result in matters becoming more precarious instead of reaching a conclusion. The actual problem of water needs to be resolved with long-term solutions. Because we are in a state of continuous shortage, we must focus on the issue first, then separately pursue the court process to prove any allegations.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 9th, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ