The seemingly unfettered influx of cellphones with multiple international mobile equipment identifier (IMEI) numbers and the availability of unregistered cellphones have created a problem on multiple levels for the telecom regulator. With mobile theft frequently ranking high in the petty crime charts, the Telecom Policy 2015 sought to address it by calling for a framework which would block the use of stolen phones, phones with either no or duplicate or non-standard phone identifiers. It would also address some of the concerns of our security services.
The PTA indigenously developed the Device Identification, Registration and Blocking System (DIRBS) and implemented it in May this year. But the authority unilaterally decided to set October 20 as the deadline for all users to make sure their phones were either registered or compliant with PTA regulations.
The short window provided, coupled with the implications it had for those who would only just discover that their phones were not compatible with the telecom infrastructure in the country, was ostensibly far and wide.
It created a fair bit of panic. Search terms and videos about what DIRBS was and what it meant trended on top online social networking. In the end, a panel of senators pressured the PTA into deferring the deadline. But given that the authority was only acting per a policy developed by the government, why did parliament or even the government fail to maintain greater oversight over this crucial project or at least attempted a comprehensive campaign to inform the public about it in advance? This is the question which needs consideration.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 20th, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ