The Deepwater Horizon disaster


Aakar Patel June 01, 2010

The continuing oil spill off the southern coast of the United States shows how limited the world’s technology actually is. We can see the oil coming out of the ground in a live video that British Petroleum (BP) has set up at the menacingly named Deepwater Horizon rig. But there hasn’t been a successful way to plug it.

This is remarkable because the leaking pipe is only 21 inches across, less than two feet. One would imagine that plugging something that small might be easy, but it hasn’t been. And so two million litres of crude oil is flowing into the Gulf of Mexico every day. Some estimate that the spill may actually be many times that. The reason that the operation has been difficult is that the pipe is 1.6 kilometres under the sea. This makes it difficult to access, though clearly it wasn’t difficult to drill and extract oil from such a depth in the first place.

The damage to the environment from the leak is to the ecology of that part of America, and also the economy. Some of the most profitable fishing off American waters happens in the Gulf of Mexico and now that will be affected possibly for years.

The area is also a big tourism location, but that is also expected to suffer heavily now, especially given the state of the struggling US economy.

It is quite strange for us in poor nations to see the most powerful companies and men in the world put on display their helplessness.

There have been three attempts to seal the pipe and the latest, and most expensive, method was tried so apologetically that its failure was no surprise. That was the ‘top kill’ method, which shot heavy liquids down two thin pipes into the leak to block it physically. The qualification that BP offered was that since this method had never been attempted at this depth it was not clear if it would succeed. It didn’t.

BP is a giant corporation and its revenues of about $250 billion are the same size as Pakistan’s GDP. But for now it is absorbing serious blows both by way of publicity and financial loss. It has already spent about a billion dollars on containing the spill and much more expense is on its way. Its stock lost five per cent of its value on Monday alone.

President Obama has also cut a sorry figure in this mess, though for little fault of his own.

People think he should display anger and somehow arm-twist BP into doing more, though it isn’t clear what more can be done at this point.

The long term solution to the leak, and this is the direction that the crisis appears to be moving at this point, is that a series of new wells be dug, diverting the oil away from the leaking pipe.

This is expected to take up to 90 days, till August. This is uncomfortably close to November 2, the date when America will vote in its midterm elections. These will decide all the seats in the House of Representatives and a third of the Senate. With the American economy showing little sign of revival, and with Obama seen as a man unable to assert himself, the extreme wing of the Republican party could storm to victory in the House. And that would really compound the disaster.

Published in the Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2010.

COMMENTS (1)

Qalandar Khan Mastana | 11 years ago | Reply Dear Mr. Pa'tel Thank you for paraphrasing the news for us and saving us from the opinion bit, those indeed are dime a dozen and than some, one can even buy one and get a handful for free. However, wee bit of perspective might have shed some light or caste a few shadows even point a pointed finger or two. A few pointers for your next "opinion piece" as they call it in the business. You might could have mentioned, for instance, other industrial accidents, you didn't even have to go too far from Mumbai nor further back in time to 1984, Bhopal. Or to 1986 Chernobyl or 1976 Three Mile Island. You could have asked probing questions, drawn parallels, and who knows in the process you might even have arrived at a few conclusions of your own. For a moment I thought you were up to something when you brought up the 21 inch pipe and 2 million liters of crude flowing into the Gulf per day, I thought you would mention the velocity and the pressure that could force 2 million liters of crude per day and even as a layman, one would think there ought to be several layers of safety that could have been tested and checked and most likely were not. You could have asked, for instance, who was supposed to have verified and regulated such measures and didn't. You could for instance have mentioned the melt down of the financial industry, that too has destroyed lives and livelihoods, that too could have been kept under check, who knows, you might have seen common threads - mind works in strange ways. Just saying.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read