China has lent Pakistan $1 billion to boost the South Asian country's plummeting foreign currency reserves, two sources in Pakistan's finance ministry told Reuters, amid growing speculation of another International Monetary Fund bailout.
The latest loan highlights Islamabad's growing dependence on Chinese loans to buffer its foreign currency reserves, which plunged to $9.66 billion last week from $16.4 billion in May. The lending is the outcome of negotiations for loans worth $1-$2 billion that was first reported by Reuters in late May, the two sources told Reuters. "Yes, it is with us," said one finance ministry source, in reference to the Chinese money. The second source added that the "matter stands complete".
Another $1 billion loan makes its way from China
With the latest loan, China's lending to Pakistan in the fiscal year that ended in June breached $5 billion. In the first 10 months of the fiscal year China lent Pakistan $1.5 billion in bilateral loans, according to a finance ministry document seen by Reuters.
During this period Pakistan also received $2.9 billion in commercial bank loans mostly from Chinese banks, ministry officials told Reuters. Beijing's attempts to prop up Pakistan's economy follow a strengthening of ties in the wake of China's pledge to fund badly-needed power and road infrastructure as part of the $57 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), an important cog in Beijing's vast Belt and Road initiative.
Pakistan in talks with China to borrow $1b
But analysts say China's help will not be enough and predict that after the July 25 national election the new administration will likely seek Pakistan's second bailout since 2013, when it received a package worth $6.7 billion from the IMF. "Looking at the current scenario, it is likely after the new government comes in that they will go to the IMF," said Suleman Maniya, head of research at local brokerage house Shajar Capital.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ