A relationship too vital to break

In my view, interests of Pakistan and the United State have great convergence.


Rasul Bakhsh Rais May 23, 2011
A relationship too vital to break

Relations between Pakistan and the United States, particularly the current phase in which Washington and other capitals are engaged, at multiple levels, with a number of state and non-state elements need to be given a serious thought in both countries. The stakes in how the war in Afghanistan ends are too high.

The point is that a war that brought the US and Pakistan into a third strategic partnership may also cause disengagement. My argument is that if this happens, perhaps Pakistan will lose more than any other partner. The costs of losing American support might be far greater than any benefits we can expect.

Politics and diplomacy cannot be conducted through emotions and vague concepts, rather they should be guided by rational calculations of national interest and practical considerations of facts on the ground. One of our national dilemmas is the projection by our media of a besieged mentality — this is sustained by a paranoid mindset, prevalent among many sections of Pakistani society. This has created a mindset among Pakistanis that the world is divided into two parts, one that is with us and the other that is against us. The paranoia I am referring to depicts even the best friends of Pakistan as ‘adversaries’.

Many of the narratives on our relations with the United States and other western countries are also rooted in an irrational anti-western streak that looks at western powers essentially through the anti-colonial ideological prism. In a globalised world where most Asian countries, including our best friend China, greatly value connectivity with the western world our pseudo-nationalists think otherwise. Nothing can be more self-destructive than the argument that we don’t share interests with the western powers or that our relationship with them doesn’t work to benefit us.

Never can relations between any two countries be one-way traffic. In my view, interests of Pakistan and the United State have great convergence in a number of important areas. From Pakistan’s point of view, prominent among these interests are: Reconciliation and stability of Afghanistan, defeating militancy and extremism and, larger issues of development and national security.

Pakistan’s support to the United States to defeat insurgency in Afghanistan is equally crucial. More important will be Pakistan’s cooperation in reaching a workable and durable peace settlement with the Taliban. Severing relations with Pakistan at this stage may not help the US achieve its objectives either. Meanwhile, the fallout of breakup with the United State on Pakistan’s regional and international standing will be far too serious than the damage the United States might suffer. It will push Pakistan into isolation, perpetuate negative national images that have hurt us already and encourage extremist groups and parties against moderate, mainstream politicians and political parties.

This is not to argue that issues that have created problems between Islamabad and Washington are trivial or they don’t exist. They do, but they require more engagement and diplomacy with an open mind, rather than the attitude of a peevish old man. Terms of engagement are always subject to negations, but not the engagement itself.



Published in The Express Tribune, May 24th, 2011.

COMMENTS (17)

Ali Wazir | 13 years ago | Reply @sarim Its neither obvious or clear that anyone (other than the establishment) has benefited from the relationship from its current state. $ 20 billion dollars Aid including the $7 Billion CSF liabilities. In civilian projects 40 -50 % is funelled back to the American Aid economy. Most of money is propping up our totally dysfunctional military at the expense of other institutions.$70 Billion has lost, we dont have any foreign investment, growth at 2%, Health and social indicators the worst in the region. Health to GDP ratio 2 lowest in the world.Massive energy and water crisis. And in civil war in 2/4 provinces. Karachi our financial hub in the worse possible security situation, our industries grinding to a halt. The rupee depreciating fast. Stagflation setting in.Neither US invest in power projects neither lets us get Irani gas, neither open up there markets to our products. As for being "Derogatory" I dont think I owe anyone an apology. The writer writes in newspapers and comes in TV as a public intellectual using his institution for respectability and then passes this dribble as "analysis". In fact this is a broader problem with our intellectual culture.We blame the military and politicians all the time but Dont intellectuals have responsibility of truth to there country???. They come up with this utter nonsense for foreign consumption(like how drone strikes are very effective and popular in tribal areas, how american aid has done miracles etc etc) so they get there trips to US conventions, get to right for some Washington think tank or foreign policy magazine or become a "defense analyst" or a terrorism "expert".. Why not show some courage and write how our military is effectively taking over all business in the country, about massive human rights violation are being done by our forces in Baluchistan and tribal areas, actual perception of US policy, how our establishment is strong armed by the US to make decision against Pakistans interest, no we have Wikileaks). They are just greedy sycophants who have sold there respectability a long time ago to the Dollar. Are we really surprised that conspiracy theory is so popular in Pakistan youth??? Its clear our "intellectual" will not give you the truth. you can count the honest and sane Pakistani intellectual on one hand(Ayesha Siddiqa,Nosheen Ali, Mahir Ali few others) so sorry I dont think I owe them any respect because of there degrees and tenure at an instituition
Sarim Zia | 13 years ago | Reply Ali, I think it's rather derogatory to get personal or make remarks about an institution. You seem intelligible enough to know that, therefore let's just keep this professional and about the article. While the relationship between the countries might not be entirely balanced in terms of mutual benefit, it is clear and quite obvious that Pakistan, and not just the top few at the ladder of it, is deriving a hefty bit from this relationship. However, my main concern is with the open berating of the relationship by many a politician and analysts. However foul the play may have been, whatever happened to the diplomacy that international relations entailed with them? Fine, according to this one side, we may just be the serving platter for US' needs, but if we are to sustain anything from this relationship once the need dries up, there is an urgent need for a return of diplomacy. Instead, all we see in politician's trying to win a hoot and a cheer by making irrational but unfortunately popular statements that tend to settle best with those who generally have little idea about things anyway.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ