SC directs govt to contact US authorities over reports of Aafia Siddiqui's death

CJP seeks certificate from US authorities confirming that Aafia is alive


Hasnaat Mailk June 07, 2018
Aafia Siddiqui. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has directed the government to contact US authorities over recent reports of Aafia Siddiqui’s death.

A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar on Thursday took up a petition filed by Aafia’s sister, Fauzia Siddiqui, seeking repatriation of the former. During the hearing, the CJP noted that there were conflicting reports regarding her death. He asked the Attorney General of Pakistan as well as the Pakistani Embassy in the United States of America to submit a report.

While the CJP directed the AGP to contact the US embassy to check over Siddiqui’s health, her sister Fauzia said that according to media reports the Pakistani Consulate General held a meeting with Aafia on May 28 but it remains unverified.

CJP to hear petition seeking repatriation of Aafia Siddiqui


Earlier in the day, the chief justice had rejected registrar office objections on the petition while hearing the appeal in his chamber. The bench asked Additional Attorney General Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, who was sitting in the courtroom, to get information in this regard within three days.

The application was filed by Aafia’s sister Fauzia last month.

Last month, Dr Fauzia approached the Supreme Court requesting it to order the government to provide an update on the mental and physical state of Dr Aafia and confirm independently that she is alive and well, the petition said.

She also urged the court to order the government to extend cooperation in obtaining a US visa to allow Dr Fauzia to visit her sister and also demanded that a committee be constituted — which should include a team of medical experts to examine Dr Aafia’s health.

Pakistani diplomat rubbishes rumours of Aafia Siddiqui’s death

The petition pleaded the top court to formulate a comprehensive policy for protecting fundamental rights of Pakistanis detained abroad.

Dr Aafia Siddiqui, who was convicted in 2010 on charges of attempted murder and assault of US personnel, is serving an 86-year sentence at the Federal Medical Centre, Carswell in Fort Worth, Texas, US. Her sister Dr Fauzia has highlighted the plight of Pakistanis, who have been detained in prisons of foreign countries and has requested the court to look into the issue, considering when they can be repatriated through diplomatic efforts.

The petition deplored that several Pakistanis had been detained in foreign prisons on petty offences without any assistance or help from the Pakistan government. In her petition, Dr Fauzia has named as respondents the government through secretaries of law, interior, foreign ministries, overseas Pakistanis and human resource development as well Hussain Haqqani.

COMMENTS (2)

Alex | 2 years ago | Reply Hello Your website or a website that your company hosts is infringing on a copyright protected images owned by our company mailchimp Inc. . Check out this document with the URLs to our images you utilized at tribune.com.pk and our previous publications to obtain the proof of our copyrights. Download it right now and check this out for yourself https storage.googleapis.com c8qhff44bb7f.appspot.com w IU3K1H4VTyAa1hD.html a 136507636997090459 I believe you have deliberately violated our rights under 17 USC Section 101 et seq. and can be liable for statutory damage of up to 140 000 as set forth in Section 504 c 2 of the Digital millennium copyright act DMCA therein. This letter is official notification. I seek the removal of the infringing materials described above. Please be aware as a company the DMCA requires you to remove and disable access to the infringing content upon receipt of this particular notice. In case you don t stop the utilization of the above mentioned infringing content a law suit will likely be commenced against you. I have a strong belief that utilization of the copyrighted materials mentioned above as allegedly violating is not authorized by the copyright owner its legal agent or the legislation. I swear under penalty of perjury that the information in this notification is correct and hereby affirm that I am authorized to act on behalf of the proprietor of an exclusive right that is presumably violated. Very truly yours Alex Scarola Legal Officer mailchimp Inc. mailchimp.com 08 27 2022
Brenda | 3 years ago | Reply Hello My name is Brenda. Your website or a website that your company hosts is infringing on a copyright-protected images owned by me personally. Take a look at this doc with the hyperlinks to my images you used at tribune.com.pk and my previous publications to find the evidence of my copyrights. Download it right now and check this out for yourself https sites.google.com view k39vgj2cj49hc-03hvb28vgv 0 folders shared f download l 839879435633117468 I really believe you ve willfully violated my legal rights under 17 USC Section 101 et seq. and could be liable for statutory damages as high as 120 000 as set forth in Section 504 c 2 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act DMCA therein. This letter is official notification. I seek the elimination of the infringing materials mentioned above. Please take note as a company the DMCA demands you to remove or and terminate access to the copyrighted materials upon receipt of this notice. In case you do not stop the utilization of the aforementioned copyrighted content a lawsuit will be commenced against you. I do have a good belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as presumably infringing is not approved by the legal copyright owner its legal agent as well as laws. I declare under penalty of perjury that the information in this notification is correct and that I am currently the copyright owner or am certified to act on behalf of the proprietor of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Regards Brenda Polus 06 03 2021
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ