In Lebanon vote, candidates shell out dollars for coverage

A minute of air time on some privately owned television channels will rack up a $6,000 bill


Afp April 25, 2018
A candidate of Lebanon's Future Movement is interviewed on television ahead of May 6 parliamentary election. PHOTO: AFP

BEIRUT: Six thousand dollars can buy a minute of air time, but a talk show episode can cost $240,000. In Lebanon, media outlets are charging parliamentary candidates exorbitant prices for coverage.

Tillerson says Hezbollah 'part of political process' in Lebanon

Whether beamed into living rooms on television screens or heard over the radio, legislative hopefuls are keen to get their messages out to their constituents before the May 6 election.

The long-awaited vote is the first since 2009, and marks the end of a years-long political stalemate that had paralysed Lebanese government institutions.

The deadlock had also left news organisations across Lebanon starving for both content and funds. Most of their financial backers are politically affiliated and have found little use for their media arms in a time of muted political rivalry.

But now that elections are on, the competition, the news cycle, and the money are flowing again. In addition to paid campaign ads, private outlets are also charging candidates for one-on-one interviews and appearances on talk shows.

"Election season has prompted Lebanese media outlets to offer packages that can reach up to $1.5 million per electoral list," says Roula Mikhael, who heads Maharat, a civil society group monitoring Lebanon's upcoming vote.

The price lists are only recited verbally, to avoid being traced, but Maharat received a detailed breakdown from some campaigners. "A month and a half ago, a minute on a morning television programme could cost you $1,000. But the prices go up steadily as the elections get closer," says Mikhael.

Now, a minute of air time on some privately owned television channels will rack up a $6,000 bill. Radio stations charge $3,000 for a 15-minute interview. And channels perceived as independent can charge more than those with clear political affiliations.

In a first, Lebanon's new electoral law has set a spending limit on campaigns and established an electoral commission to monitor media appearances.

Paying for coverage is not illegal, according to the law, but channels are required by the commission to identify sponsored media appearances and specify who paid for them. Its chief, former judge Nadim Abdulmalak, told AFP the amounts cited by Maharat were higher than those reported to the commission. But he did admit outlets were violating other parts of the legislation.

An employee of the electoral monitoring committee watches a televised speech of a Lebanese parliamentary candidate and records the time of his speech at the headquarters of the committee in Beirut on April 11, 2018. PHOTO: AFP An employee of the electoral monitoring committee watches a televised speech of a Lebanese parliamentary candidate and records the time of his speech at the headquarters of the committee in Beirut on April 11, 2018. PHOTO: AFP

"Media organisations are not abiding by the law. They are not identifying paid advertisements or saying who placed the ad," says Abdulmalak.

"They are also, more generally, not fulfilling the requirement of presenting a weekly report to the commission of what ads they broadcast," he says. The commission has struggled since its delayed inception to properly flag any violations.

Its only member to have come from outside the political elite resigned on April 20, blaming a shortage of resources that left the body "unable to monitor media, campaign ads, or spending."

At its headquarters, 25 employees are silently scrutinising a mix of media. One unfurls a newspaper and squints her eyes at the text. Another is glued to a laptop screen, jotting down how long candidates appear on air.

"As monitors, we've noticed that media outlets host some guests more than others based on their political affiliation," says commission member Manal Ezzedine, 34. "There are some candidates that you've never heard of or seen, because they don't have media coverage."

A total of 597 candidates are running for parliamentary office, including many newcomers who have railed against rampant corruption and clientelism in Lebanon.

Those first-time candidates say they struggle to get coverage because it's too expensive. "Who can pay $20,000 these days for half an hour on air, besides the traditional parties that we've known for years?" says Laury Haytayan, a candidate running in Beirut on the Kulluna Watani list.

Exorbitant prices for media coverage are forcing first-time candidates in Lebanon's general election to turn to social media to reach potential voters. PHOTO: AFP Exorbitant prices for media coverage are forcing first-time candidates in Lebanon's general election to turn to social media to reach potential voters. PHOTO: AFP

"Elections can't be for the wealthy only," she says. Maharat's Mikhael said the prices asked by Lebanese media outlets risked turning the elections into a race among the rich.

"Everyone knows Lebanese media has been going through a very serious financial crisis," she says. "Today, we're returning to a situation where people with money are the only ones able to actually come to power in Lebanon, where the rich alone are allowed to have media appearances."

Lists like Kulluna Watani and other non-traditional parties are targeting first-time voters -- those that were not 21 in the 2009 election -- through social media.

Lebanon museum unveils artefacts looted during civil war

Raed Ataya, who is running in southern Lebanon on a list bringing together communists and local figures, announced his candidacy through a free live-streaming option online.

He and fellow candidates were primarily funded by donations and could not afford the "ridiculous" press price lists. "When we announced our list, we did so on Facebook Live, without a single media outlet present," Ataya says.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read