In the 2013 elections, records revealed tampering at the polls by various parties. There were also personal accounts from people who reported bullying-type behaviour by members of certain political groups. For 2018, perhaps the political bullying and coercion will be reduced. However, we must take into consideration that the National Judicial Policy Making Committee once ceased the involvement of members of the judiciary in elections due to political controversies arising. This was a very serious accusation assigned to our judiciary.
It must be ascertained that no such imbroglio ensues during this year’s elections. In this regard, it may be wise to act upon the Free and Fair Election Network’s suggestion that a range of officials should be appointed as returning officers.
No matter who is assigned this role, no strategy is foolproof unless there exists an effective disciplinary plan to take action against officers found involved in illicit activities. For the country, it would be a public relations nightmare should officials from the judiciary acting as ROs or DROs be found guilty of wrongdoing. Thus, a contingency plan needs to be in place before appointments are finalised. Punitive consequences will need to be drastic and leave a lasting impact on fellow citizens as well as other nations.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 1st, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ