Both countries accuse the other of aggressive acts, both sides periodically exchange artillery fire, both sides suffer both civilian and military casualties and neither side so far as is known has made incursions into the territory of the other. As noted previously in these columns, there exists a state of managed instability that fluctuates within a set of defined parameters. Outright conventional war is unlikely as is a nuclear exchange. Both sides maintain expensive — but aging in terms of equipment — armies and air forces and capable navies.
Viewed objectively Pakistan has made more effort to advance the cause of peace than has India in the last decade, and since Modi came to power in India nationalist forces have done all they can to keep the pot of instability bubbling. Stir in the Americans who are currently muscling Pakistan for not having done enough yet again and Pakistan begins to look beset by all sides with few moves in the playbook. Back-channels are doubtless busy but the domestic preoccupation is the coming election, not the nuances of multilateral relationships. Diplomatically the situation is not dissimilar to that of 2002 following the attack on the Indian parliament; the difference being that today Pakistan is leaderless and vulnerable with an interim government in the wings. We may be certain that Modi and his henchmen will be alert — and Pakistan must be no less so.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 18th, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ