Uber celebrates 'victory' after Brazil loosens regulations

The legislation does not include aspects of an initial draft as to which organizations threatened their operations


Afp March 02, 2018
The Uber app logo is seen on a mobile telephone in this October 28, 2016 photo illustration. PHOTO: REUTERS

Ride-sharing giant Uber Thursday celebrated the loosening of industry regulations in Brazil following a hard battle with lawmakers in one of its biggest markets.
"The Chamber of Deputies went a step further so Brazil has a modern regulation which makes good use of technology for the good of people and cities," Uber said in a message to its local users.

Uber CEO sees commercialization of flying taxis in 5-10 years

The legislation, which regulates ride-sharing apps at a national level, does not include aspects of an initial draft which organizations including Uber and competitors Cabify and 99 said threatened their operations.
The first draft required drivers to obtain a special license issued by local authorities and own the vehicle they were driving -- something not required of taxi drivers.
The final version states local authorities can create rules and supervise such private hire services, but they cannot control them through the issue of licenses.
Uber -- which has 20 million users and 500,000 drivers in Brazil -- organized protests outside Congress last October protesting the original version of the legislation, while CEO Dara Khosrowshahi traveled to Brazil to meet with lawmakers and finance minister Herique Meirelles.

Uber's fourth-quarter loss narrows to $1.1 billion
"Uber always defended modern regulation for private individual transport which uses applications, and today we can celebrate this victory," the company said.
Uber operates in over 600 cities worldwide, facing widespread resistance including from taxi driver unions that accuse them of unfair competition.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ