Was bin Laden really calling the shots?

Doubt and derision in Pakistan at the suggestion that Osama bin Laden's hideout was Al Qaeda central.

Reuters May 08, 2011
Was bin Laden really calling the shots?

ISLAMABAD: It didn't figure. U.S.Intelligence released footage of a grey-  bearded, disheveled figure wrapped in a shawl and wearing a woollen hat, and then it said that this same old man had been calling the shots on al Qaeda's plots around the globe.

There was doubt and derision in Pakistan on Sunday at the suggestion that Osama bin Laden's hideout north of the capital, Islamabad, was somehow an "active command and control centre" for al Qaeda.

"It sounds ridiculous," said a senior intelligence official.

"It doesn't sound like he was running a terror network."

For one thing, there was no internet connection or even telephone lines into the compound that U.S. commandos raided a week ago, killing the world's most-wanted man.

More critically, analysts have long maintained that, years before bin Laden's death, al Qaeda had fragmented into a decentralised group that operated tactically without him.

"It's BS," said another senior Pakistani security official, when quizzed on a U.S. intelligence official's assertion that bin Laden had been "active in operational planning and in driving tactical decisions" of the militant group from his secret home in the town of Abbottabad.

"They will say whatever they like. I can say tomorrow that he was planning to make nuclear or chemical weapons ... Would you believe it? I think there's an element of exaggeration. They're playing it up."

A senior U.S. intelligence official said in Washington information carted away from the compound by U.S. forces after the May 2 raid, including the videos, several clips of which were released, represented the largest trove of intelligence ever obtained from a single terrorism suspect.

The official said the materials showed that bin Laden had remained an active leader of al Qaeda, which made the operation that led to his death "even more essential for our nation's security".

Two countries, two versions

Pakistan's military, caught off guard by the Abbottabad swoop and now facing accusations that it was either too incompetent to catch bin Laden or complicit in hiding him, has sought to depict the al Qaeda leader as a man of diminished influence.

Stressing bin Laden's weakness makes his discovery in the middle of a garrison town less embarrassing for Pakistan, but playing up his importance makes the U.S. operation all the more glorious.

Analysts say that bin Laden's centrality to the network had already faded. While the man behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States served as an inspirational figure, strikes on Western targets were increasingly plotted and instigated by autonomous splinter groups.

"As a matter of leadership of terrorist operations, bin Laden has really not been the main story for some time," Paul Pillar, a former senior U.S. Intelligence official told Reuters last week.

Talat Masood, a Pakistani defence analyst and retired general, said bin Laden distributed videos occasionally and he may have passed computer disks with ideas for strikes to his couriers, but it was hard to see how that would put him at the nerve centre of operations.

"The only thing he could have done in that house is to record video and audio messages," a senior security official said in Islamabad.

"How could he control the whole of al Qaeda from there while he has no communications system? How can he control the entire al Qaeda when he was living with two guards, an 18-inch television and no big weapons. It's just an exaggeration."


Aziz | 13 years ago | Reply @noor I agree. It's a Jewish-Christian-Hindu-Atheist conspiracy to tarnish Pakistan's image. The whole world is conspiring against us. That's absolutely certain. Or is it? Is our mental state better described as paranoid schizophrenia?
noor | 13 years ago | Reply u think that a person resident in Afghanistan, without ph & internet could cause 9/11. u also think that a person residing in a telephone & internet-less house was commanding a fictitious Al-Qaeda. u think head of declared world's no 1 terrorist organisation was living with just 3 lasied and a dozen children, without any arms, etc. u think that a he could stay without knowledge of the country's agencies. if the agencies wanted to shelter him, could US track him? a big NO! all liars out there on jewish media, speaking their language. Wake up people, try to analyze before believing.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ