Syrians suffer breathing difficulties after regime strikes

Reports say toxic gas has been used


Afp February 05, 2018
Air pollution in syria due to war. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

BEIRUT: Five civilians were treated for "suffocation" on Sunday after Syrian regime air strikes on the northwestern town of Saraqeb, a monitor said.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported a "foul smell after regime helicopters struck several areas of the town in Idlib province, causing five civilians to suffer from suffocation".

It quoted residents and medical sources as saying "toxic gas" was used in the attack, without elaborating.

Syrian regime air strikes also killed six civilians in the town of Maarat al-Numan in the southern countryside of Idlib province, the Observatory said, causing damage to the main hospital there.

The facility had stopped working until repairs could be carried out, the war monitor said.

China says it will make efforts on Syria reconstruction

The latest developments come as the United States this week accused the Syrian regime of using chemical weapons on opposition forces near the capital Damascus.

The Syrian foreign ministry denied the accusations as "lies".

US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis told reporters on Friday his government was concerned sarin gas may have been recently used in Syria, citing reports from NGOs and rebel groups.

These reports said toxic gas has been used.

Matis however said the United States has no proof to support these accusations.

Last month, 21 people were treated for respiratory problems after rockets were fired on the rebel bastion of Eastern Ghouta outside Damascus.

COMMENTS (1)

powayman | 3 years ago | Reply Is Pakistan ever going to condemn Assad for these chemical attacks? Pakistan remained mute when Sarin (WMD) was used, remained mute when barrel bombs were dropped on civilian targets ... what's it take for Pakistan to speak out?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ