Time to make the correct choices

Remaining silent for fear of extremist backlash is a no-win policy.


Ayesha Ijaz Khan May 05, 2011
Time to make the correct choices

As soon as news of Osama bin Laden’s death was announced, the world media began asking tough questions about the extent of cooperation that Pakistan’s intelligence agencies and armed forces provided for this operation. If Pakistani forces did not know about the operation and had only been informed about it immediately prior to its execution, as is the prevalent view among analysts notwithstanding the diplomatic-speak of high level western government officials, then this raises very serious concerns, not just about sovereignty domestically, but about the lack of trust and credibility accorded to our armed forces internationally.

If, on the other hand, Pakistani intelligence and military played a key role in luring Osama to Abbottabad so that this operation could be conducted, as proposed in a Telegraph piece titled “Bin Laden killed: Whose side was Pakistan on in this shoot-out?” (May 2), then it would have been far better to take ownership of a job well done. Remaining silent for fear of extremist backlash is a no-win policy. Not only is it unwise to play both sides in this deadly war, but equally importantly, it will continue to confuse the nation about the extent of sovereignty violated, and can create doubts about the ability of the armed forces and intelligence agencies, give rise to unwieldy conspiracy theories and provide justifications to the Americans to increase solo operations within our territory.

If, for instance, those analysts that claim Pakistan was not told about the operation because it is not to be trusted are correct, then Pakistan will have very little sympathy if it protests the use of drones or the presence of boots on the ground in the form of Blackwater or otherwise, regardless of Pakistani domestic opinion on this issue. Globally, Osama and his al Qaeda ilk are considered the most wanted terrorists of our time and cooperating in hunting them down is looked upon favourably around the world. On the other hand, sheltering terrorists leads to bad press and negative ramifications for all Pakistanis, whether in the form of visa restrictions for students or calls for summoning our senior military command for questioning abroad, calls that historic adversaries like India support through their lobbies.

So the issue is not, as some aspiring politicians or media gurus in Pakistan have confused people into thinking, that our military is fighting America’s war for dollars. Instead, the question that is being asked internationally is: Has our military taken the money and yet played both sides? Has it tried to assist America at times and, at other times, assisted the terrorists who are fighting America? OBL’s presence so close to Kakul has brought all these festering issues to the fore and nobody can clarify them better than the powers that be.

To be fair, it must not have been easy for the establishment to cut ties from the Taliban that it helped create. The Russian invasion of Afghanistan was very destabilising for our region and the ensuing relationship between the American and Pakistani forces that joined together to use jihadi ideology to fight the invading Russians created severe long-term problems, not the least of which were evidenced by the gradual radicalisation of both Pakistan and its military, a phenomenon that helped General Ziaul Haq maintain his undemocratic hold on power and resulted in a draconian force taking hold in Afghanistan after the defeat of the Russians. Although we cannot rewrite history, we can make choices that serve our national interest and that interest does not lie in supporting draconian forces that are frowned upon the world over and have neither the ideas nor the funds to better the lives of ordinary people.

Pakistan’s strategic depth in Afghanistan will have to rely on the hospitality that was provided to Afghan refugees by our people for a very long period of time. The sooner we take a clear stand, aligned with the prevailing world opinion, and come clean with our people, the better it will be for Pakistan. Otherwise, if this duplicity continues, not only will Pakistan’s armed forces be maligned internationally, but our own people will begin to look upon them as incompetent or, at worst, insincere.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 6th, 2011.

COMMENTS (22)

Cherish Raj | 13 years ago | Reply @DeceptiveMindGame: Every country decides its governing system. But the Pakistan army is the biggest impediment to peace and security in the region. It has no real vision and is plagued by negativity. Pakistan army is an establishment of some one million people who decides the fate of 180 million claiming that the people of the country is incompetent to rule themselves-'Jahil Awam'.In short, it is a chowkidar who believes that owners are a bunch of fools and uses force to prove that point. Jinnah was the product of the democratic system of British India. If there is no free and fair democratic system, then how can leaders emerge and nurture themselves. If you point out China as an excuse for success, the country is ruled by a civilian political party with a membership of some 80 million. Their military establishment is totally under civilian control. Moreover, the Pakistan army has had no real political success in its lifetime. It tried to wrench Kshmir by force in 1965 and failed. It lost half of the country in 1971 and lost Siachen in 1987. it tried to internationalize Kashmir through war in 1998 and failed terribly.Now, no international figures visiting India even mentions Kashmir. The Afghan Jihad brought drugs, refugees and guns into Pakistan. The war on terror is continuing to take its toll. The whole of Pakistan is against America now. Who brought America to the subcontinent in the first place? It was Ayub Khan, Zia and Musharaff. The only civilian leader of any repute in Pakistan was Zulfiqar Bhutto. It was he who tried to pull Pakistan out of America's orbit. And latter Zia, pushed Pakistan back into the superpower's arm. If the whole Osama operation is a drama, then why cannot the 'honest' army call a spade a spade and declare that the whole thing was a farce. In Imran Khan's own words," Jo mulk super power ke jhoothe polish karthe hai, uske hal eisa hi hoga".And everybody knows which institution in Pakistan has been carrying out the above said action for the last sixty years. Peace.
Khurram | 13 years ago | Reply "Has our military taken the money and yet played both sides? Has it tried to assist America at times and, at other times, assisted the terrorists who are fighting America?" Ms Khan the answer to both of the above posed questions, is An Irrefutable YES.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ