Be firm with Pakistan on extremism: Miliband

Milband calls on the US along with Pakistan's neighbours to keep trying to engage politically and economically.


Afp April 30, 2011

WASHINGTON: Western powers must be firm with Pakistan about its need to crack down on extremists, but there is no alternative to continuing to work directly with Islamabad, British lawmaker David Miliband said Friday.

Miliband, foreign secretary from 2007 until Britain's Labour Party lost power last year, voiced alarm at what he called the influence inside Pakistani society of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant group blamed for the deadly 2008 siege of Mumbai.

"We should be engaging with Pakistan; on the other hand, I feel very comfortable speaking very plainly about the responsibilities that they have," Miliband said at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington.

Pakistan needs to do more to hold assailants for the Mumbai attack accountable and if Lashkar-e-Taiba is expanding its reach, "then we need to be even more insistent on the need to roll up that infrastructure," he said.

But Miliband, who said he would soon travel to Pakistan, called on the United States along with the South Asian nation's neighbours to keep trying to engage both politically and economically.

"One of the most chilling things I've heard and read over the last few months is that America has a choice about whether or not to sever its links with Pakistan," Miliband said.

"Because if you think it difficult, frustrating, enervating, dangerous dealing with Pakistan at the moment as a partner, try fulfilling your own interests in South Asia without Pakistan as a partner," he said.

Miliband welcomed a letter sent by President Barack Obama to his Pakistani counterpart Asif Ali Zardari in late 2009, in which the US leader offered expanded cooperation but demanded Islamabad do more against militants in India and Afghanistan.

"It was a very important step, proposing a strategic relationship for the US and Pakistan to replace the unbalanced - essentially military-only relationship, individual leader-based relationship - of the past," he said.

"I have criticised the Pakistani government for the way in which it failed adequately to respond to the significance of the outreach," he said.

COMMENTS (15)

sumeet | 13 years ago | Reply it will be generous on the part of mr. milliband to advise US take some firm action to win the trust of indians.you can't step on two different boat and want to maintain balance.either you are with us or with them.US need to shed its double standard and make south asia policy clear.
Pulpfiction | 13 years ago | Reply @David Salmon....With the US credit outlook changed to negative by S&P and with the continued advances of the Taliban I doubt it if the US or Nato will remain in Afghanistan after 2016. This is an un-winnable war; the Russians found out after 10 years and they didn't have to get their supplies through a third country. The Afghan people despise the US and NATO forces and consider them as occupation forces that have killed and maimed thousands of innocent civilians. I am sorry this was a badly thought idea to begin with and other than initial success its been a continued failure.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ