
The landlocked country is increasingly wary of historical underrepresentation of certain communities. For instance, marginalised groups living in the south complain about the boundaries drawn up for the new states. They claim that these boundaries tend to favour people from the hill country whose representatives have dominated politics for decades. It is not clear whether the 2015 Constitution – a flexible document that supposedly allows room for amendment – can address the grievances of marginalised groups in the near future.
Political parties have been shy to allot tickets to women and representatives of marginalised groups. This is reflective of the patriarchal mindset of the political class. Merit is sacrificed at the altar of expediency in the case of the disenfranchised communities.
For the purpose Nepalese authorities have developed a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system and a Proportional Representation (PR) system. But since both these systems are untried and untested, it will require a supreme effort and will to make it work. The goal of inclusive political leadership perhaps cannot be accomplished otherwise.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 27th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ