Judiciary being blamed for poor investigation standards: CJ

Chief Justice says the judiciary cannot give a decision against any person where evidence is insufficient.


Express April 24, 2011
Judiciary being blamed for poor investigation standards: CJ

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said on Sunday that deteriorating investigation standards result in courts releasing individuals, for which the judiciary is later held responsible.

While addressing the concluding ceremony of the three-day judicial conference in Islamabad, the Chief Justice said the judiciary cannot give a decision against any person where evidence is insufficient.

His statements come after public uproar over the court's ruling to release five defendants and commute a sixth defendant’s death penalty to a life sentence in the controversial gang rape case of Mukhtaran Mai.

Chaudhry said the objective of the conference was aimed at improving the national judicial policy.

Chaudhry also said some people have accused the judiciary of interfering in the affairs of executives, however, the judiciary has constitutional powers to regulate the government machinery.

He added that justice was being delayed because of shortage of staff in the judiciary. He also demanded the government remove discrepancies in salary packages of judicial officers.

COMMENTS (17)

Mubasher Pasha | 13 years ago | Reply I disagree with "justice was being delayed because of shortage of staff in the judiciary". That excuse is merely a scape goat for the Judiciary. In reality, they don't need to increase the number of judges, they need to decrease the number of cases. Here's how & why: "Chief Justice said the judiciary cannot give a decision against any person where evidence is insufficient". The Judiciary admits it cannot give a decision without any evidence, yet it keeps entertaining cases that are lodged without a shred of evidence. In the first instance, the Judiciary should dismiss all fabricated cases that have baseless allegations without evidence. This will automatically decrease the number of cases as well as discourage people from filing fabricated cases knowing it'll be dismissed. Secondly there should be a system of penalties & repercussions for allegations that are proven a lie to further discourage fabricated cases & hence less burden on courts with only genuine cases to deal with.
Usman Arshad | 13 years ago | Reply This shows how substandard and submissive our judicial system is.I agree with CJP that deteriorating investigation leads to such nasty situations.However,Judges should take action against those officials who donot pay heed to their duties. Mukhtaran Mai case was such of them in which influentials Mastois removed all the evidences.I am suprised that if CJP knows that why he does not take action against those officials who had already removed the evidences. Sorry to say,if this continues then public would start to do justice themselves.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ