Speaking to the media outside the accountability court on Thursday, she said the former premier had pulled the country out of darkness, ushered in an era of prosperity, and given it the multibillion-dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and road infrastructure, checked terrorism in its tracks and given the first ever health and education systems.
Therefore, Nawaz Sharif did not need to run away from accountability and the country, she added.
One who failed to control dengue can’t criticise Shehbaz, says Marriyum
The state minister said only a person like Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan, who she said had been abusing and denigrating state institutions and was a real thief, would run away from the courts and use abusive language against them.
The minister said that Imran Khan could not face the people publicly “because he knew he was a thief.” She said that Nawaz Sharif had said he would himself set a tradition of accountability in the country and by appearing in the courts, he surely had set a unique example.
The ousted prime minister had also said that nobody would be able to avoid accountability and those who were raising a hue and cry would also be taken care of soon, Marriyum said, adding that by appearing before courts, Nawaz Sharif wanted to restore the sanctity of vote and honour of the people, who had elected him prime minister for the third time.
Nawaz arrives in Islamabad, escorted to Punjab House by ASF
Referring to the PTI chief’s objection on security being provided to Nawaz Sharif, she said he did not understand the difference between protocol and security. “A person who has fought against terrorism surely needs security while the one like Imran, who has been a part of them and supported them, do not,” she said.
The people of Pakistan were with the Constitution and Nawaz Sharif, who loved them, served them and put the country on the path of sustained development, said the minister.
IHC orders fresh hearing of Sharif's petition to combine NAB references
Marriyum reiterated that only the elected representatives could serve the masses and bring prosperity to the country and unless the sanctity of the vote of the people was restored, the country could not march ahead.
She said neither the Supreme Court nor JIT and NAB could unearth any corruption against the thrice elected prime minister and after one and a quarter year sent him home on ‘Iqama’ (work permit for UAE).
“Collection of evidence was outsourced to companies in London, but no incriminating evidence could be found from the heaps of material that was collected,” she added.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ