Imran to 'voluntarily' appear before ECP on October 26

The elections supervisory body starts scrutinising PTI foreign funding record


Danish Hussain October 16, 2017
Imran Khan. PHOTO COURTESY: PTI

ISLAMABAD: The PTI has announced its chief Imran Khan will ‘voluntarily’ appear before the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) which has issued non-bailable arrest warrants for him in a contempt case.

On October 12, a five-member bench of the ECP issued the warrants after the PTI chairman ignored the polls supervisory body’s August 24 show-cause notice.

Imran, who was accused of ‘defaming and scandalising’ the top electoral body by a disgruntled PTI member Akbar S Babar, has earlier ignored at least half a dozen ECP summons to appear in person as he insists that the ECP lacks jurisdiction to start contempt proceedings against an MP.

PTI begins preparations for general elections

However, in what comes as a major deviation from his stated stance, the PTI on Monday issued a statement after its core group meeting, announcing that Imran would appear before the ECP despite standing by the PTI’s earlier stance on the issue of ECP’s jurisdiction.

“Imran Khan will go to the ECP voluntarily on October 26, without prejudice to the PTI’s view on the issue of contempt taken before the IHC for challenging jurisdiction of the ECP on contempt,” said the statement.

The statement issued by the PTI’s central media department said the primary job of the ECP is to hold fair and free elections and enforce the electoral laws and election code of conduct.

“The party’s core group categorically finds that the ECP has failed entirely in this. The core group feels the CEC must realise the genuine grievances the PTI has as a result of the events and action and in some cases of inaction during hearings against the party as well as its chairman, and in by-elections.

“The lessons to have been learnt through 40 critiques, pointed out by the Judicial Commission (JC) in the rigging case, have been ignored in all subsequent by-elections that have followed where the ECP failed to rectify any of these 40 lapses in electoral law,” it added.

Cases against Imran keep PTI legal team on toes

The statement said the chief election commissioner (CEC) had sought only to scrutinise the PTI’s accounts, its funding and its overseas membership despite the fact that PTI was one of the few political parties to submit details of all its accounts every year before the ECP.

“The CEC, ignoring grave violations of the election law and code on the part of the PML-N in by-polls like NA-120 and earlier in NA-122, has also led to serious issues being raised by the PTI core group,” it said.

It all started on November 14, 2014 when one of the PTI’s founding members, Akbar S Babar, filed a case in the ECP against the PTI’s alleged funding from prohibited foreign sources.

The case – which is still pending before the commission – took several turns before Babar on January 23, 2017 filed a contempt application against Imran for what he called his “scandalous remarks” on the ECP.

Imran later challenged in the IHC the ECP’s jurisdiction to start contempt proceedings against him after the ECP rejected his plea that it could not conduct contempt proceedings.

Talking to The Express Tribune, Babar said, “Sooner or later, Imran Khan has to understand that it’s the judges not him to decide about jurisdiction of some court. I hope at this late stage, Imran will show some serious regret for continuously disgracing the prestigious constitutional forum.”

COMMENTS (2)

Tarique | 6 years ago | Reply ECP also has nawaz Sharifs people on payroll so no surprise there that real criminals are blocking Imrans path to becoming PM and the will pay dearly if he becomes PM
MASOOM | 6 years ago | Reply This is not voluntary appearance but made possible by Danda ! Now he like other habitual law breaking was proud of it for not appearing on repeated summons but non bailable warrant did worked on like these peoples !
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ