In hot waters: PTI to move court against Ahsan Iqbal over iqama

Party will seek interior minister's disqualification under Article 62 and 63


Our Correspondent October 07, 2017
PHOTO: EXPRESS

LAHORE: After taking Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif to court for possessing a UAE work permit, or iqama, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has decided to file a petition against Interior Minister Ahsan Iqbal too – for the same reason.

PTI leader Babar Awan visited Narowal and met local party leader Abrarul Haq, Ahsan’s political rival in his constituency. The two discussed moving the court against the interior minister for possessing a work permit. It was decided that the PTI would file a petition against Ahsan next week.

Awan told reporters his party would seek Ahsan’s disqualification from public office under Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution, similar to the petition filed against Asif.

Iqama allegation: Larger IHC bench to hear Asif’s disqualification case

Haq told the media that though Ahsan had conceded that he possessed an iqama, he had not disclosed this fact in his nomination papers filed with the Election Commission of Pakistan when he was running for polls. He added there was enough evidence against Ahsan to have him disqualified by the court.

Foreign Minister Asif is already facing a similar case in the Islamabad High Court.

The petition against the foreign minister was filed by Mohammad Usman Dar – a PTI candidate in the 2013 general election in NA-110, the Sialkot constituency in Punjab province from where Asif was elected to the National Assembly.

In the petition, Dar submitted that in view of the facts and documents appended with the petition, “this is a fit matter for inquisitorial proceedings; and that Asif is not entitled to hold the office of MNA nor of the federal minister under the Unlimited Term Employment Contract (Employment Contract) between Asif and Int. Mech & Elec Co. LLC (IMECL), a limited liability company located in Abu Dhabi existing under the laws of the United Arab Emirates (UAE)”.

PTI leader tweets Kulsoom Nawaz’s ‘Iqama’

The petitioner has claimed that Asif has been continuously employed as a full time, salaried employee of IMECL since at least July 2, 2011, and has held various positions, including legal adviser and special adviser.

He has submitted that first article of the employment contract stipulates that Asif must provide the services thereunder within the UAE while the second one states that employee shall only have one rest day per week.

As per the contract, he has claimed, Asif was to receive a monthly basic salary of AED35,000 along with a monthly allowance of AED15,000 which brings the total payment to AED50,000 per month. The same is already being received by and to which the respondent (Asif) is entitled (as a receivable and asset) whilst acting as the foreign minister of Pakistan and MNA from NA-110.

Dar has further claimed that the salary and allowances amount to Rs17,211,816 per annum at the prevailing current exchange rate and they have never been properly disclosed in Pakistan, adding that Asif is thus betraying his dishonest intent and non-righteous character.

He has stated that the documents attached with the petition regarding Asif’s employment period in the UAE reveal that he remained a fulltime employee at the IMECL from 2011 or before, till date. The documents, he maintains, prove that the latest labour card from UAE’s Ministry of Labour was issued on 29-6-2017 and the expiry date on it is June 28, 2019.

Zardari’s Iqama image fake, fabricated: PPP

According to the petition, despite being the foreign minister and an MNA, Asif intends to secretly continue his full-time employment with IMECL, in violation of his oath, his obligation of fidelity and the assurance of no conflict to federal minister office, while also being against his continuing obligation under provisions of Article 62 and 63 of the constitution.

He has argued that Asif has secretly been a fulltime, salaried employee of an offshore company from which he is entitled to receive a substantial salary amongst other allowances, alleging that he concealed this material information during the 2013 general election, declaring that he was a businessperson.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ