Militants seek attacks on France over full veil ban

France's ban on the Muslim full face veil has triggered calls on militant online forums for armed retaliation.


Reuters April 14, 2011
Militants seek attacks on France over full veil ban

LONDON: France's ban on the Muslim full face veil has triggered calls on militant online forums for armed retaliation against the country, a US-based terrorism monitoring service said on Wednesday.

Some contributors to the messages seen on the password-protected, invitation-only militant chatrooms this week called on al Qaeda's North Africa arm to "deter" France by staging armed attacks, the SITE service said.

The anonymous threats, presented by the sites as comments by individuals, carry none of the weight of published audio or video statements by Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda or similar established armed groups seeking to attack Western targets.

But Western security officials are concerned that sermons, discussions and videos published on online forums and social networking sites are increasingly used by militants to encourage sympathisers to attempt attacks.

Individuals radicalised online or via email have carried out a handful of attacks in United States and Britain since 2009.

"Sarkozy, leave our sisters alone or we will truly be obligated to act on our words," wrote one participant with the online identity of "Jabeen of Abdullah Azzam", writing on the Arabic-language Shumukh al-Islam forum, SITE reported.

"Declare a war against crusader France!" wrote "al-katebat al-khdra" (the green battalion) on Shumukh al-Islam. "France with such action brought destruction and woes on itself."

France's ban on full face veils, a first in Europe, went into force on Monday, making anyone wearing the Muslim niqab or burqa in public liable to a fine of 150 euros or lessons in French citizenship.

The law has provoked a limited backlash in France where a strict separation of church and state is seen as central to maintaining a peaceful civil society. But it has been widely criticised by Muslims abroad as harming their religious freedom.

Unlike most of the ban's Muslim critics, the online militants favour a violent response to the law.

Participant "Abuhamza" called on al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb to attack France, which he said was positioning itself as a larger enemy of Islam than the United States.

Shumukh forum members posting in an April 12, 2011 discussion called on bin Laden to carry out attacks in France and proposed the creation of a fund to plan and execute attacks against France and French interests, SITE said.

Unlike Britain and Spain, France has never been attacked by al Qaeda at home, despite being a NATO member that took part in the invasion of Afghanistan and still having troops there.

In a statement in October 2010, bin Laden condemned the ban on full-face Islamic veils passed by French constitutional authorities earlier that month and said France deserved to be attacked for "injustices" against Muslims.

COMMENTS (25)

Yousaf Hyat | 13 years ago | Reply I think the veil is not Islamic but Arabian in origin..Does the Quran say cover your face or does it say be modest..?
maynotmatter | 13 years ago | Reply So it is unjust and intolerance to ban women from wearing burqa and is it fair for muslim nations to ban women what they want to wear and force them to wear a burqa? There is intolerance shown towards women in either case. Don't just ban French for intolerance, I guess muslim nations by far are intolerant about many many things. The list is endless. Read the article itself. Muslims are so "violently" intolerant that they would kill people to drive their point. Talk about being civilized. Now you know why world hates Islam. Not that Islam by itself is bad, but people like these they defame it. It is duty of every muslim to save Islam from such radicals and show the world that Islam is not about violance. Where is the so called message of peace when you guys act like this ?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ