NAB references: Sharif family decides to seek protective bails

Sources say former PM has decided to face the NAB cases according to the law


Amir Khan August 26, 2017
PHOTO: REUTERS / FILE

KARACHI: As the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) inches closer to filing references against the Sharif family, the deposed premier, his children, son-in-law, and a close aide have decided to seek ‘protective bails’ to evade possible arrest, sources in the ruling PML-N have told Daily Express.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court disqualified Nawaz Sharif for concealing assets on July 28 and directed the country’s top anti-corruption watchdog to file references against him, his two sons, daughter, son-in-law, and the finance minister.

Panamagate saga ends: Prime Minister sent packing

On Friday, NAB received details of some 26 accounts operated by the Sharif family. And a senior official said the bureau has completed the record collection process from state departments, including the SBP, SECP, and FIA.

However, sources told Daily Express that Sharif, his sons Hussain and Hassan, daughter Maryam Nawaz, son-in-law Captain (retd) Safdar and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar have decided after consulting their legal aides to approach the top court for protective bails.

Sharif, his children and Dar have already filed review petitions against the July 28 verdict of the apex court in the Panamagate case. The Sharif family’s legal is said to have also briefed the deposed premier on these petitions.

Sources said that after his discussions with PML-N leaders and his legal wizards, Sharif decided that he and his family would face NAB references against them in accordance with the law.

 

COMMENTS (3)

Aware Citizen | 6 years ago | Reply Arrest warrant will be issued when all family will run away ! And later name will be put in ECL. Same Sharjeel Memon case !!!!!
Parvez | 6 years ago | Reply The fact that he has not run and is willing yo face the charges under the law, is a major plus for Nawaz ....... his confrontational attitude after the SC ruling did not work well for him.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ