"In the last four years, the government has broken the backbone of terrorists through military operations," he said during a press conference in Quetta after chairing a meeting to review the security situation.
"Some remaining terrorists are carrying out such attacks cowardly attacks for the mere sake of their existence. However, they too will be wiped out and there won't be such attacks anymore," he added.
At least 15 people, mostly military men, were martyred and dozens wounded in a bomb attack on an army truck in a high-security neighbourhood of Quetta.
Operation Radd-ul-Fasaad: Four terrorists killed in Balochistan, hideouts destroyed
"We're in a state of war and need to be united internally. However, some political elements have been trying to weaken the country by creating internal rifts," the minister remarked.
"We have achieved great success through operations Zarb-e-Azb and Radd-ul-Fasaad and rendered many sacrifices for this purpose. It's time that we unite to bring down terrorism instead of dragging each other down."
The interior minister said the enemy was cunning and had clear objectives.
"The Centre will work with the provincial governments in the fight against terrorism," he added.
Iqbal said security personnel were on high alert and terrorists were surrounded.
"They [terrorists] can't escape and we will bring them top justice."
Earlier, the minister visited the people injured in the blast, accompanied by the Balochistan CM and the Commander Southern Command.
Visited the injured of Quetta terrorist incident in the hospital along with CM Balochistan & Comdr Southern Command. pic.twitter.com/UxyEYKuS0g
— Ahsan Iqbal (@betterpakistan) August 12, 2017
He also tweeted a picture of the meeting held to review the security situation.
Chaired a high level meeting to review security situation in wake of the terrorist incident in Quetta. pic.twitter.com/mYqtnl7SI1
— Ahsan Iqbal (@betterpakistan) August 12, 2017
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ