A full-time foreign minister finally

Key challenges await Khawaja Asif in new role

Kamran Yousaf August 05, 2017
Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

ISLAMABAD: Finally, Pakistan has a full-time foreign minister in over four years. The crucial ministry was given to Khawaja Asif in the new federal cabinet, led by Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, which took oath on Friday.

The foreign minister’s portfolio was retained by the deposed prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, as he ran affairs of the ministry through his adviser Sartaj Aziz since he had come into power in May 2013.

The absence of a full-fledged foreign minister was a subject of debate and criticism in and outside parliament given the enormity of the challenges faced by the country on the foreign policy front. Now critics and opposition have their wish fulfilled.

However, the choice for the crucial foreign minister’s post had ignited an instant debate on social media with some questioning if Asif was a suitable candidate given his reputation of being outspoken and a military’s critic.

Having served as minister for defence and water & power under the Sharif government, Asif is known for hard-hitting statements on civil-military ties. He had in the past publically questioned the role of military in political affairs.

During the 2014 sit-in by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Sharif was believed to have been persuaded by then military leadership to sideline Asif. Sharif, however, resisted the pressure, though Asif had remained conspicuous by his absence in key civil-military huddles in the following months.

In the saddle: Abbasi’s 43-member cabinet sworn in

Unlike the ceremonial role he had in the defence ministry, as foreign ministry, Asif is required to consult and talk to key stakeholders, including the intelligence apparatus and military authorities. That is why the decision to hand him the foreign ministry has raised many eyebrows.

One interpretation of the decision is that the deposed prime minister wanted to have his trusted aide on a position where civil and military authorities often clashed in the past due to divergent views.

Independent observers believe Shahid Khaqan Abbasi is a soft-spoken person who may not be able to tackle state institutions if needed. The shake-up in the cabinet is an indication that things may not be so smooth during the remaining tenure of the PML-N government.

Institutional harmony is seen as a key, especially on the foreign policy front where Pakistan has to tackle a number of challenges, including hostile neighbours — India and Afghanistan — and more importantly the possible fallout of the new US strategy for South Asia.

The challenges are ‘humongous’, admitted a senior foreign ministry official, requesting anonymity. That was the reason why the first meeting chaired by the new prime minister was on foreign policy, he added.

Also minutes after the cabinet ministers took oath at the presidency, the newly-appointed foreign minister, Khawaja Asif, could be seen chatting with Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua, suggesting that the minister had his hands full.

PM Abbasi constitutes seven new ministries

But his immediate task is certainly to establish a smooth working relationship with the security establishment, which has a major input on foreign policy matters, remarked a Foreign Office source.

Minister of State for Information Marriyum Aurangzeb defended the appointment of Asif as foreign minister. "He will be an impactful foreign minister and follow the vision of the prime minister," she said of Asif while talking to a private news channel.


powayman | 5 years ago | Reply Lack of Foreign Minister has never had anything to do with Pakistani poor choices in Foreign Policy - you can place that turd on the doorstep of the Military. Also - article says selection of someone who doesn't get along with the Military might not make sense - can't help but wonder why nobody said anything when he was selected as Defense Minister.
Imran Malik | 5 years ago | Reply If we carry on let Army handel the foreign policy we shall be fighting wars after wars. Our taxes are paying for Army perks. Fundamently army is more like an white elephant rather than a watch dog on borders. I wonder if they let the external audits to check the spendings. We can't slaughter our future under the name of national interest for ever. Education, health industry and climate change policies are suffering because our defence is eating lion share of tax money. After all we need some one to set an independent peaceful course for nation and Asif has the guts to stand up to the self interest of defense. Our past is example of defense follies. Our recent past and present impression internationally is not an exemplary one to let defence carry on the interest of Army to lead the foreign policy.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read