Members of Asma’s own group criticise her remarks

SCBA president rejects impression that Panamagate verdict is outcome of any ‘conspiracy’

Hasnaat Malik August 05, 2017

ISLAMABAD: Renowned jurist and former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) Asma Jahangir is facing severe criticism by representatives of her own Democratic Group for her recent remarks against the top court’s July 28 verdict in Panamagate case.

The group, which has a majority in the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC), issued a statement, expressing concerns over Asma’s statement.

According to sources, former SCBA presidents Yasin Azad and Kamran Murtaza are backing Asma’s stance on the Panamagate judgment. However, most group members, like Ali Zafar and Abid Saqi, hail the SC’s July 28 verdict which resulted in the disqualification of Nawaz Sharif as prime minister.

Asma Jahangir censures SC

A senior advocate said the PPP’s lawyers, who are also part of the Democratic Group and hold key posts in the superior bars, are supporting the judgment. PBC office-bearer Syed Kalb-e- Hassan, who also belongs to Asma’s group, admitted that there were divergent views in the group on Panamagate verdict but called it the ‘beauty of democracy’.

However, PBC Vice Chairman Ahsan Bhoon and Chairman Executive Committee Hafeezur Rehman expressed utmost concern on ‘vilification campaign’ against the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court.

“[We] particularly deprecate the recent statements of some individuals targeting the Supreme Court, generally acclaimed for having demonstrated, in the recent past, its independence in giving judgments and verdicts in many important cases,” said a statement issued by the two representatives.

Asma slams ‘judicial dictatorship’

“The statements [by Asma] also tried to malign the institution of armed forces which has always performed exemplary role in defending the homeland against foreign aggression, maintaining law and order situation and defeating the menace of terrorism,” it added.

The lawyers claimed that ‘calculated and motivated’ move and onslaught by individuals with vested interests at the behest of the ruling party culminated in amassing ill-gotten money of billions of rupees over the period of 35 years of being in power.”

Bhoon told The Express Tribune that the lawyers were very concerned over the malicious campaign against the five judges particularly Justice Asif Saeed Khosa. “If the malicious campaign against Justice Khosa is not stopped then I will be compelled to announce countrywide lawyers protest,” he said.

Incumbent SCBA president Rashid A Rizvi, who is associated with Hamid Khan Group, also rejected the impression that the Panamagate verdict was an outcome of any ‘conspiracy’

“If someone believes that there are errors in the verdict then he should challenge it, but should not level allegations of conspiracy,” Rizvi said, talking to media in the Supreme Court’s premises on Friday.

However, Rizvi questioned the court’s decision to nominate ‘monitoring judge’ to oversee the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) proceedings with regard to its references against Sharif’s

“The monitoring will prejudice proceedings of the accountability court. The chief justice may form larger bench to hear Sharif family’s review petition against the ruling,” he added.



MAD | 4 years ago | Reply Asma Jehangirs forte is Human Rights. Should stick to that. Leave politics to politicians. All started when she decided to enter bar politics. Only destroying her image
rana | 4 years ago | Reply lawyer leaders must see with open eyes without bias, it is a judicial martial law in the country. what ever has been done by sc under article 184 is unprecedented in history of pakistan. right now there is no 58 ii b and maliciously article 63 has been invoked to insult elected pm. lawyers leaders must read between the lines. usa directed traitors in army to sabotage CPEC and loyal dogs of usa since generations have managed this decision. army took revenge of dawn leaks twit withdrawal, injustice khosa of his sister relations with shahbaz and naeem bokhari of his former wife with pm. genocide of justice has been committed by judiciary.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read