SoftBank to buy robot maker Boston Dynamics

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed


Afp June 09, 2017
Handle is a robot built by Boston Dynamics that combines the rough-terrain capability of legs with the efficiency of wheels. PHOTO COURTESY: BOSTON DYNAMICS

SAN FRANCISCO: Japan-based SoftBank Group late Thursday announced it is buying animal-based robot maker Boston Dynamics from Google-parent Alphabet.

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed, but SoftBank portrayed the move as in sync with its vision for robotics.

NUST team competes in Dubai to create a fully solar-powered house

"Today, there are many issues we still cannot solve by ourselves with human capabilities," SoftBank chief executive Masayoshi Son said in a release.

"Smart robotics are going to be a key driver of the next stage of the Information Revolution."

"Atlas," a bipedal humanoid robot primarily developed by the American robotics company Boston Dynamics, is seen during a news conference Oct. 17, 2013, in Hong Kong. PHOTO: REUTERS

SoftBank will also buy Japanese bipedal robotics company Schaft as part of its deal with Alphabet, according to the release.

"We share SoftBank's belief that advances in technology should be for the benefit of humanity," Boston Dynamics chief executive Marc Raibert said in the release.

This robot suitcase follows you around and answers voice commands

"We look forward to working with SoftBank in our mission to push the boundaries of what advanced robots can do."

SoftBank has invested in a human-shaped "Pepper" robot that can serve as a helpful companion, while the line-up at Boston Dynamics includes four-legged machines with names like "Big Dog" and "Wildcat."

Boston Dynamics also has humanoid "Atlas," which uses "balance and whole-body skills."

Alphabet bought Boston Dynamics in 2013 and has reportedly been looking to sell the acquisition for about a year.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ