Hence, our lethargic court systems are left to solve everyone’s problems, with members scratching their heads and desiring they had forensics teams that were better equipped. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court must hold one or the other party in this case culpable not just for their depraved actions but to also make an example out of their dishonesty.
That the boy employed was underage is a matter to be dealt with utmost care; violations of child labour laws continue with employers and parents having no knowledge about the stipulations, such as the maximum number of three daily work hours. Furthermore, in this case, for instance, under the Punjab Restriction on Employment of Children Act of 2016, employers are outright prohibited from hiring children, defined as persons below age 15. Secondly, even if one employs an adolescent, between 15 and 18, hazardous work environments are prohibited. Judgments are best left to the honorable Supreme Court. However, the aspect of child labour must be tackled in a way that dissuades parents and employers from employing children, who, given their naivete, can be easily manipulated and exploited.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 17th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ