Panamagate verdict: Sharifs indecisive over review petition as deadline nears

Experts advise PM’s family against challenging the April 20 decision


Hasnaat Malik May 14, 2017
Prime Minister Nawaz Shairf in a conversation with brother and Punjab Chief Minister Shehbaz Sharif. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: After three weeks of discussions, the Sharif family is still indecisive whether or not to file a review petition against the Supreme Court’s April 20 judgment in the Panamagate case. They will not be able to do so after May 20.

Top legal experts consulted by the family advised them not to challenge the verdict by the five-judge larger bench of the apex court, fearing further complications.

Sources told The Express Tribune that most legal experts believe that the Sharif family could experience more legal complications, including the disqualification of the prime minister.

Panamagate case: PM’s family appoints Khawaja Haris for legal assistance

Sources said that Khawaja Haris, who is assisting the family before the Joint Investigation Team [JIT], had also advised them to exercise caution in this regard and seek legal opinion from other experts.

Makhdoom Ali Khan, Salman Akram Raja and Shahid Hamid, who represented the Sharif family in Panamagate case, recommended them not to contest the apex court’s decision.

Currently, Salman Akram Raja, who represented the PM’s sons, is aboard.

Panamagate case: Civil, military agencies submit names for JIT

One member of the legal team had even opposed the very idea of approaching the apex court for expunging certain remarks by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa.

Citing the verdict in the National Police Foundation case, a senior PML-N lawyer said that the bench, led by former Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, had given certain remarks against former MNA Anjum Aqeel Khan and ordered the Federal Investigation Agency [FIA] to probe a land scam. Later, Aqeel successfully cleared himself from FIA’s inquiry. Similarly, he conjectured, the PM and his family could clear themselves before the JIT.

He believed that if a review petition was filed, it would give undue importance to the minority judges’ remarks, which otherwise had no legal importance.

Qatari royal family to be sent a set of questions by Panamagate JIT

“In another case, one Lahore High Court judge had approached the SC for expunging certain paras of a judgment, but the court wrote something more against him.”

It is learnt that the Sharif family was focusing on JIT so that they could be exonerated.

Former Additional Attorney-General Tariq Mahmood Khokhar believes that the minority judges’ remarks “cannot realistically be expected to be expunged”.

COMMENTS (4)

JKhan | 6 years ago | Reply @K B Kale: Just shut up. Your women are being raped with impunity. Pay attention there.
Salman | 6 years ago | Reply File, don't file. Doesn't matter. Nawaz will now and forever be know as the Godfather
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ