National headcount: Non-inclusion of differently-abled persons issue resolved, says centre

Issue dealt with on directives of apex court, Lahore High Court


Our Correspondent March 26, 2017
Soldiers walk with an official (L) from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics as they arrive in a residential area to collect information for a census in Lahore on March 15, 2017. PHOTO: AFP

KARACHI: The issue regarding the non-inclusion of differently-abled persons in the ongoing national headcount has been resolved, the federal government informed the Sindh High Court (SHC) on Friday.

During the hearing of a petition against the non-inclusion of differently-abled people in the nationwide data collection drive on Friday, the federal law officer said that the authorities had resolved the matter in light of the directives issued by the Supreme Court as well as the Lahore High Court.

Headed by Justice Munib Akhtar, the bench adjourned the hearing due to the absence of the lawyer representing the non-profit organisations that had moved the court seeking inclusion of differently-abled people in the census.

SC seeks explanation from PBS for ‘neglecting’ persons with disabilities in census

On the last hearing, the federal law officer had told the court that the data of differently-abled persons will be collected after the ongoing national census, on a sample basis, as was done during the last census held in 1998.

Case history

The petition was filed by non-governmental organisations All Pakistan Blind Association and Amity International, which alleged that the enumerators were not collecting details of blind people. According to them, there were around 20 million visually impaired people across the country, of which there were five million in Sindh alone.

The court was pleaded to order the concerned authorities include a separate column in the forms for differently-abled people.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ