After the release

Religious parties, right wing elements should really not be objecting at all given their support for ‘Islamic’ laws.


Editorial March 17, 2011
After the release

The fear of a backlash by orthodox forces always seems to be greater than the actual event. There was apprehension of large-scale protests after Pakistan opted to support the US in the aftermath of 9/11 2001; nothing happened beyond a few days of violent street rallies. Similarly, the release of Raymond Davis, following a settlement based on the handing over of blood money, has so far resulted in only a few sporadic demonstrations and some vitriolic comments from the usual gang of suspects (read: Self-righteous TV show hosts).

There is irony in the fact that the Jamaat-i-Islami, whose members attempted to break into the US Consulate in Lahore following the CIA contractor’s release, should have to face the reality that he was let-off under the qisas and diyat laws, proposed by the late General Ziaul Haq, a key mentor for the party. The religious parties and the right wing elements should really not be objecting at all — given their support for ‘Islamic’ laws and their vehement disapproval of all suggestions that, in at least some cases, reform is urgently needed to prevent misuse (as in the case of honour killings) of the legislation. Perhaps a realisation that they have been beaten at their own game explains their response so far. As for the public’s reaction, other than pockets of anger, as reported by this newspaper, there has not been a mass outpouring of public rage.

Of course, this not to say that people are not feeling disappointed and frustrated by the quick unfolding of the whole affair, especially since the fate of the third man’s family and what happens to the quest for finding his killer is left unresolved. In all of this, perhaps, it is difficult to ignore the fact that the media, or significant sections of it certainly, willingly or unknowingly, played into the hands of those who think themselves to be keepers of the nation’s sovereignty and this perhaps led many people to think that releasing Davis would be tantamount to selling our national honour for a few dollars. If anything, it can be said that for a change, all centres of power — the federal and the Punjab governments  and the military — were all on the same page on this issue.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 18th, 2011.

COMMENTS (7)

Uza Syed | 13 years ago | Reply @Mubarak Ali: Sir, I slightly disagree with you here. Even the Mullah has to worry about his livelihood ----- it's his job to keep us all 'worried' and concerned by created threat to us and our faith ----- it's his main job to keep us, at least, misinformed and ideally outright ignorant. Imagine, us as being better informed and better educated citizen that'll be the day when Mullah fears being out of business. O' Mullah's are the most worried folks right now and working overtime in manufacturing half-truth and falshood to poison our minds. Remember, we, as long as ignorant, are their only hope for survival and we must be kept ignorant. Mullah will give his "anything" including what he he considers his most valued "commoditity" to keep us uneducated, misinformed and ignorant.
Mubarak Ali | 13 years ago | Reply @Humanity: Glad to see you on this post. Your comments are always to the point, keep it up. As for mullahs are concerned they have no worry to earn their livelihood. Mullahs have ample time to make trouble, as this is the only thing they have learnt well. Hazrat Allama Iqbal has rightly said: Deene mullah fi sabeel Allah fasad.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ