The Ten Commandments

The parting of ways between the Nawaz faction of the Muslim League and the PPP was not at all unexpected.


Anwer Mooraj March 07, 2011

The parting of ways between the Nawaz faction of the Muslim League and the PPP was not at all unexpected. Discontent had been brewing for some time. What is surprising, however, is that Mr Sharif took so long to untie the knot that bound together the unholy alliance and to tell Mr Gilani that his party has so woefully underperformed that it was time to throw in the towel. It was the Muslim Leaguer’s Ten Commandments that finally did it. Mr Gilani decided it would be better to give Punjab a wide berth rather than implement a series of measures in which a lot of PPP heads were likely to roll.

If one takes a good hard look at Mr Sharif’s reform programme, one would recognise in the strictures not only a way to save the country from the kind of situation that developed in Tunisia and led to a revolt, but also a blueprint on how the country ought to be governed. What is wrong with reducing government expenses by 30 per cent and curtailing the number of ministers? Or the suggestion that all court judgments, including the ones pertaining to the NRO, should be implemented in full? The suggestion about having an independent accountability commission is also a good one, but one can’t help remembering that old saying that has stuck in the cranium of every lawyer: “Who will judge the judges?

However, the issue that nicks the collective nerve is the sudden, abrupt raise in the price of petroleum products, and here the prime minister is treading on very thin ice.

Mr Zardari and Mr Gilani have often trumpeted the achievements of the PPP, but curiously enough most of the people that this writer has spoken to can’t seem to remember just what these accomplishments were. It’s different with Mr Sharif. While many feel that he leans too much towards the extremists and there is an excoriating provincial primness and a repressed snobbery about the man, people do remember that he made the rupee freely convertible and rescued it from the hobble of exchange restrictions, even though he subsequently froze foreign exchange assets. He built an eight-lane highway from Lahore to Islamabad, changed the weekly holiday from Friday to Sunday in the face of opposition from the Muslim clergy, so that the business community was in touch with international financial capitals five days a week. And he exploded the bomb, cocking a snook at the Indians who behaved as if theirs was the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. But above all, he understood economics and represented a power shift from the traditional feudal clans to a growing class of modern entrepreneurs.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 8th, 2011.

COMMENTS (7)

Gulkhaiz | 13 years ago | Reply Anwer has put across his point of view in a convincing and succinct manner. However some of the readers’ comments are based on short lived and often repeated clichés, which have no relevance to the present time and facts. E.g. • Every one knows that a good infra structure is a prerequisite for economic development. People should be aware that three major cement plants, with a capacity of almost 6.3 million tons per annum have been constructed in Kallar khar/ Chakwal area, right on the lips of Motorway, thus providing impetus to the growth in surrounding areas. What else isr economic benefit? Moreover if it is not a good thing why subsequent governments are still constructing motorways? Projects like motorway are of national significance and cross the political affiliation, but somehow some of us politicize them and create confusion. • Another political anomaly in this country is a political slogan of “SARMIADAR KHATAM KARO”. How can you invite foreign investment when you want to finish your own Sarmiadars? No where in the world Govt is the main source of providing jobs. The govt create conducive environments and develop infrastructure for the growth. Jobs are mainly created by the private sector, i.e. by those people who have money. Whether we like it or not, or we bring revolutions Pakistan cannot come out of the present economic crisis without the industrial development….i.e. WITHOUT JOBS., and of course stable law and order. • Furthermore as pointed out by Anwer, he (Nawaz) understood economics and represented a power shift from the traditional feudal clans to a growing class of modern entrepreneurs. In my opinion he fits the job description. • As far as nuclear explosion is concerned it is irrelevant as to who takes the credit of developing nuclear bomb. The point is that the development of nuclear capability was conceived as a project of national importance and was completed and being run in the same spirit, (I wish we could do the same with dams and other energy generation projects).The credit is given to Nawaz because at the end of the day, besides tremendous foreign pressure he took the decision to test the nuclear device. Consequently he demonstrated the ability to analyze and take tough decisions. Development of the country has nothing to do with the ethnicity. Therefore, it is myopic to bring Punjab or Sind etc into it. Even the most advanced countries of the world ARE IMPORTING TRAINED AND SKILLED MANPOWER FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD TO KEEP THE MOMENTUM OF GROWTH. But some how we are stuck in the primitive thinking of ethnicity and do not gel into a nation. Let us come out of the quagmire of nonproductive ideas and past legacies. and elect people who are capable of providing leadership to the country.
AK | 13 years ago | Reply Pretty lame effort for praising so called Ameer ul Momineen.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ