‘Pakistan tried to trade Davis with Aafia’

American TV reports say Pakistan govt offered to trade Davis for Aafia, but the offer was dismissed by the US govt.


Express March 01, 2011

The Pakistan government offered to trade CIA contractor Raymond Davis, accused of killing two people for Pakistani neuroscientist Dr Aafia Siddiqui suspected by US intelligence to be an al Qaeda operative, America’s ABC television reported on Monday.

According to a senior American administration official and a Pakistani official involved in the negotiations to free Davis, the Pakistan government proposed trading Davis for Aafia, who is currently serving 86 years in federal prison for attempted murder.

The offer was immediately dismissed by the US government. “The Pakistanis have raised it,” the US official said. “We are not going to pursue it.”

The proposal is the latest in a series of efforts to break an impasse between Washington and Islamabad over Davis. Davis has been held by Pakistani authorities since late January for shooting and killing two men he says were following his car and tried to rob him.

Aafia was convicted of trying to shoot FBI agents and military officers in an Afghanistan police station in 2008. She had been arrested the day before after being found with a list of New York city landmarks and instructions on how to construct explosives.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 1st, 2011.

COMMENTS (33)

pround paki | 10 years ago | Reply y davis in pakistan? y he was not in any other place? y russian agencies continuously expose his missions? from where taliban get american guns? who gave them lot of dollars? two pplz at 10 am try to rob him in crowdy street? if davis is Ambassador so y his ambacy wan go back when paki police arrested him.? why indians defend davis?
Veny | 10 years ago | Reply sorry for the error, Read "if your ignorant of some subject" instead of "if you are ignorant of something subject" Thanks
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read