Sania, with her former Swiss partner Martina Hingis, started on a journey to win grand slams and reached the top of the doubles player rankings and was celebrating her stay at the top for 80 consecutive weeks.
Sania Mirza becomes sole world number one in women's doubles
Today I complete 80 consecutive weeks as the number 1 player in d world👆its been an amazing journey and just inspires me to work harder @WTA pic.twitter.com/BsHoeU0YAT
— Sania Mirza (@MirzaSania) October 18, 2016
And while the world was busy felicitating the Indian tennis star, Manjrekar fired in a sarcastic remark followed by congrats.
No 1 doubles player you mean. Congrats! https://t.co/Qrdyigdrro
— Sanjay Manjrekar (@sanjaymanjrekar) October 19, 2016
Sania, obviously enraged by the remark, didn’t resist from roasting the cricket commentator.
Since I don't play singles anymore isn't that obvious/common sense?my bad,common sense is not that common after all I guess.. :) https://t.co/fXhnaQZEM7
— Sania Mirza (@MirzaSania) October 19, 2016
Nevertheless, she then thanked him for the wishes.
Dip in form: Sania, Hingis end successful partnership
Hey.. But thanks for your wishes though ofcourse https://t.co/fXhnaQZEM7
— Sania Mirza (@MirzaSania) October 19, 2016
Manjrekar, now on back foot, tried to defend himself.
Well, you missed out an important detail for someone like me who lacks common sense :) https://t.co/nLgRFONxrn
— Sanjay Manjrekar (@sanjaymanjrekar) October 19, 2016
But Sania was again on the charge against him and fired away an article in her reply so that Manjrekar could take a look at all the ‘important details’.
Clearly!!! So here you go https://t.co/vRE2vmk1ka .. An article with all the 'important details' .. :) https://t.co/lZTGBSsUNA
— Sania Mirza (@MirzaSania) October 19, 2016
She then posted a photo on Instagram to celebrate her victory over the former cricketer.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BLvBWJzh-Tc/
Who won? Who lost? You decide!
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ