Kvitova ends barren run with Wuhan title

Former world number two dismisses Cibulkova 6-1, 6-1 in final

Afp October 02, 2016
With the first set under her belt, Kvitova refused to take her foot off the gas as she smashed 28 winners in the match to coast to victory in a little more than an hour. PHOTO: REUTERS

WUHAN: Two-time Wimbledon champion Petra Kvitova ended her 13-month title drought with a straight-sets win over Dominika Cibulkova at the Wuhan Open yesterday.

The former world number two appeared to be in a hurry to secure the crown — her second in Wuhan — taking just over an hour to defeat Cibulkova 6-1, 6-1.

Kvitova has had a year of stark highs and lows — scooping an Olympic bronze medal but failing to get further than the round of 16 at any of the grand slams.

“I need this kind of consistency all year, which to be honest, I don’t think I can. I’m probably the player who has up and downs,” Kvitova told reporters after the final.

Konta inches closer to world’s top ten

After the run of early-round exits at the start of the year, she appears to have turned the tide in China and the Wuhan title will see her move to 11th in the rankings when next week’s leaderboard is released on Monday.

She also has an outside chance of qualifying for her fifth consecutive WTA Final in Singapore.

Cibulkova, meanwhile, is assured of a new career-high ranking on Monday — rising to number eight.

World number one Kerber survives scare

She also now sits at number seven on the Road to Singapore leaderboard but needs a strong run in Beijing next week to guarantee her first ever qualification in the elite eight-player event.

“I’m not thinking about Singapore that much because that would be a dream come true if I would get there,” said Cibulkova. “I don’t want to put too much pressure on myself.”

Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2016.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read