US Senate votes to override Obama's 9/11 bill veto

The rare act of bipartisanship is a severe blow to Obama, who lobbied hard against the bill

Afp September 28, 2016
The rare act of bipartisanship is a severe blow to Obama, who lobbied hard against the bill. PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON: The US Senate voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to override Barack Obama's veto of a bill allowing 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia, the first such rebuke of his eight year presidency.

In a landmark vote, Senators 97-to-one backed the override, with only outgoing Obama ally Harry Reid voting against, teeing up a similar vote in the House of Representatives later Wednesday.

The rare act of bipartisanship is a severe blow to Obama, who lobbied hard against the bill, known as the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA).

It marks Obama's last months in office and shows the White House to be much weakened.

9/11 anniversary: Do not allow terrorists to divide America: Obama

Obama has issued 12 vetoes during his presidency, until now none have yet been revoked, a rare feat given Republicans' long control of Congress.

The White House argued the bill would undermine the principle of sovereign immunity and open up the US itself to lawsuits.

In a letter to Republican and Democratic Senate leaders obtained by AFP, Obama said "I strongly believe that enacting JASTA into law would be detrimental to US national interests."

Obama warned of "devastating" consequences for the Pentagon, service members, diplomats and the intelligence services.

US to pay $1.2m to drone victim’s family

It would "neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks, nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks," he warned.

Families of 9/11 victims have campaigned for the law -- convinced that the Saudi government had a hand in the attacks that killed almost 3,000 people.

Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens, but no link to the government has been proven. The Saudi government denies any links to the plotters.

Declassified documents showed US intelligence had multiple suspicions about links between the Saudi government and the attackers.

"While in the United States, some of the 9/11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi government," a finding read.

The bill's cosponsor, New York Democrat Chuck Schumer told Senators it "would allow the victims of 9/11 to pursue some small measure of justice."

Behind the scenes, Riyadh has been lobbying furiously for the bill to be scrapped.

A senior Saudi prince reportedly threatened to pull billions of dollars out of US assets if it becomes law, but Saudi officials now distance themselves from that claim.

The US-Saudi relationship had already been strained by Obama's engagement with Saudi's Shia foe Iran and the July release of a secret report on Saudi involvement in the attacks.


vinsin | 5 years ago | Reply @ali khan: Drone Campaign was approved by Pakistani government, so you cannot sue US government. You can demand compensation from Pakistani gov though. Pakistani already got money for such campaign also.
ali khan | 5 years ago | Reply time to sue us gov for drone strikes lol. if they open the door we have suffered alot of innocent deaths at the hand of their drone campaign.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read