Tense talks

Delay caused by Davis case in crucial trilateral talks to discuss the future of Afghanistan will serve as a setback.

Editorial February 14, 2011

Behind the diplomatic words, uttered through closely clenched teeth, the tensions are so obvious there seems to be little sense in denying that they exist. The trilateral US-Pakistan-Afghanistan talks, scheduled originally for February 23 and 24, were intended to work out a plan for the endgame in Afghanistan and plans for a US troop pull-out. Both Islamabad and Washington have been denying a link with the ongoing Raymond Davis saga. But few doubt that Washington’s announcement on February 12 of a ‘postponement’ due to ‘political developments’ in Pakistan is linked to growing ire over the detention of the man who the US says enjoys diplomatic immunity and must, under the Vienna Convention, be freed.

There have been reports that the mood in Washington is growing angrier by the day with talk of expelling Pakistan’s ambassador to the country. This has been denied by Husain Haqqani. Tempers in the US capital will not be helped by the statement from the Tehreek-i-Taliban suggesting that Raymond Davis be hanged immediately, as a spy. The affair appears already to have cost Pakistan its foreign minister, with Shah Mahmood Qureshi reported to have lost his post under US pressure, following his apparent questioning of Davis’s immunity.

The affair is a complicated one. The delay in the crucial talks to discuss the future of Afghanistan will, without doubt, serve as a setback to the process — especially as we do not yet know when it may be possible to resume them. The talks, held periodically to assess stability in Afghanistan and tactics in the region, would have been the first since US President Barack Obama spoke of his vision for Afghanistan in December last year, reasserting plans for a complete pull-out by 2014 and a troop reduction this year but promising a longer term commitment to the region. Details would have been discussed the meeting that has been postponed. For all the brave words in public, Pakistan Foreign Office sources concede the delay in this dialogue is damaging — especially as it is still far from clear how the Davis affair will conclude, how far anti-Americanism will continue to grow as it lingers on and what impact it will have on the crucial issue of Pakistan’s sovereignty as well as on its longer term relations with Washington.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 15th, 2011.


Raja Arsalan Khan | 10 years ago | Reply The issue has been grabbed by the Islamists, conservatives, semi-modernists, quasi liberals and others all the opportunist versions of various sorts to utilise the public sentiments based on hatred in their favour. I am not advocating that foreign nationals should roam the streets in Pakistan but there are many other aspects. Where were the Munawars when Badabher was allotted to the US within 10 years after creation of the country. Surely, they supported the move. Again what has happened after 1979 is an open secret as "honest and patriotic" people joined jihad business and received shields at the White House by the virtue of winning the battle. If Pakistan was clear on rooting out the extremists, no Raymond and Blackwater would have in the headlines.We are in habit of deciding the matters on the streets, a typical norm of feudal society where even the household matters are discussed in panchyats or jirgas (traditional councils). First decide what we are and what we want to be. You would have gain a clear picture, helping you to ascertain your strengths and weaknesses, and then formulating the interests and the strategy (strategies) for achieving them, whether for hoisting the flag at Denube or making yourself a respectable part of comity of nations.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read